From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: add do_fixup_by_compatible with u32 and string version
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:44:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218174433.GJ19322@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130218085947.GK1906@pengutronix.de>
On 09:59 Mon 18 Feb , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 07:18:39PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> > ---
> > common/oftree.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/of.h | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/oftree.c b/common/oftree.c
> > index 6b20cdb..82e5ddd 100644
> > --- a/common/oftree.c
> > +++ b/common/oftree.c
> > @@ -229,6 +229,33 @@ void do_fixup_by_path_u32(struct fdt_header *fdt, const char *path,
> > do_fixup_by_path(fdt, path, prop, &val, sizeof(val), create);
> > }
> >
> > +void do_fixup_by_compatible(struct fdt_header *fdt, const char *compatible,
> > + const char *prop, const void *val, int len, int create)
> > +{
> > + int off = -1;
> > +
> > + off = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(fdt, -1, compatible);
> > + while (off != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND) {
> > + if (create || (fdt_get_property(fdt, off, prop, 0) != NULL))
> > + fdt_setprop(fdt, off, prop, val, len);
> > + off = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(fdt, off, compatible);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> IMO we shouldn't increase the dependency on libfdt. The fdt format is a
> nice storage format, but it sucks for modifying the tree.
> I created some patches to get rid of libfdt entirely yesterday. They are
> not complete yet, but removing libfdt has some nice effects:
>
> - Smaller binaries
> - No more parallel universes of fdt and internal trees. This currently makes the
> devicetree code messy
> - I trimmed down the overhead of unflattening/flattening significantly.
> It still adds some overhead to do it, but manipulating the tree is a
> factor of 50 faster which means once you have multiple manipulations
> of the tree it reduces the overhead to a net win.
ok will this be availlable for next release ok ohterwise can we have this
patch first so we can have the fixuo support for highbank
Best Regards,
J.
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-16 18:18 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-02-18 8:59 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-02-18 17:44 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2013-03-04 7:56 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130218174433.GJ19322@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox