From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] clk: Using the "is_enabled" to determine the clock state
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:52:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130315085235.GD1906@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363329340-13126-2-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:35:39AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index cb94755..d5dbbd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ int clk_register(struct clk *clk)
>
> if (clk->flags & CLK_ALWAYS_ENABLED) {
> clk->enable_count = 1;
> + } else if (clk->ops->is_enabled) {
> + clk->enable_count = clk->ops->is_enabled(clk);
> }
No. The enable_count should be a pure software counter only which helps
us to keep track whether we can disable a clk on the next clk_disable or
whether there are still users left.
This reminds me that I created a similar patch for this a few days ago.
I'll send in a minute.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 6:35 [RFC 1/3] clk: Remove unneded private "parent" fields Alexander Shiyan
2013-03-15 6:35 ` [RFC 2/3] clk: Using the "is_enabled" to determine the clock state Alexander Shiyan
2013-03-15 8:52 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-03-15 6:35 ` [RFC 3/3] clk: Add "is_enabled" callback for gated clocks Alexander Shiyan
2013-03-15 8:29 ` [RFC 1/3] clk: Remove unneded private "parent" fields Sascha Hauer
2013-03-15 8:48 ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130315085235.GD1906@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shc_work@mail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox