From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from eso.teric.us ([69.164.192.171]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UKVZb-0003pg-Ea for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:14:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:21:09 -0500 From: Josh Cartwright Message-ID: <20130326152109.GH16050@kryptos> References: <20130319154901.9111A25817@kryptos.localdomain> <20130319155432.GC16050@kryptos> <20130325091247.GW1906@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130325091247.GW1906@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] macb: rename platform data To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:12:47AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Josh, > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:54:32AM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:26:00PM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > [..] > > > >From 0d51dc731ff3934e22e78405a992658a8d3bf1de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Josh Cartwright > > > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:22:48 -0500 > > > Subject: [PATCH] parameter: fix build warning when !CONFIG_PARAMETER > > > To: barebox@lists.infradead.org > > > > Ugh, sorry that I butchered patch submission and this mail ended up with > > two patches together; should I resend? > > No, it's ok. I applied the macb pdata rename. If you wish to have the > other one applied, please resend this one. It looks like what was applied to your tree was a squash of these two changes together, so no need to resend. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks, Josh _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox