From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UUwPi-0004yL-KF for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:54:59 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:54:55 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20130424095455.GC32299@pengutronix.de> References: <1366794547-29296-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1366794547-29296-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mci: add Secure Digital Host Controller Interface support To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:09:07AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > as today more and more hw use it so import a sdhci implemetation based on > linux. Problem is that the Linux implementation sucks :/ At least on i.MX this driver is a pain to use. It needs more quirks than fit into a 32bit variable and still the i.MX port needs driver logic in the register accessor functions. Maybe i.MX is the worst of all implementations, but I'm not considering using the Linux driver for i.MX on barebox. If other SoCs work better with the Linux driver we can still merge it though. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox