From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 14.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([188.165.51.82] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UUyQU-0007tY-Km for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:03:55 +0000 Received: from mail173.ha.ovh.net (gw6.ovh.net [213.251.189.206]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 25E32FF8FAA for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:03:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:58:55 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Message-ID: <20130424115855.GF13393@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1366794547-29296-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20130424095455.GC32299@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130424095455.GC32299@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mci: add Secure Digital Host Controller Interface support To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 11:54 Wed 24 Apr , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:09:07AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > as today more and more hw use it so import a sdhci implemetation based on > > linux. > > Problem is that the Linux implementation sucks :/ > > At least on i.MX this driver is a pain to use. It needs more quirks than > fit into a 32bit variable and still the i.MX port needs driver logic > in the register accessor functions. Maybe i.MX is the worst of all > implementations, but I'm not considering using the Linux driver for > i.MX on barebox. > If other SoCs work better with the Linux driver we can still merge it > though. on STM it work better Bes Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox