mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC only] ARM: i.MX: Fix SDRAM size detect
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:48:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426104806.GR32299@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366971714-32682-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:21:54PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> This is a trying to fix problem described in:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2013-April/014182.html

Sorry, can you explain what the problem is and how this patch fixes
that?
How I understood it the problem was that your board had the second chip
select enabled without having sdram connected there leading to a wrong
size detection.

>  void __naked __noreturn imx51_barebox_entry(uint32_t boarddata)
>  {
> -	unsigned long base;
> -	unsigned long size;
> -
> -	base = MX51_CSD0_BASE_ADDR;
> -
> -	size = imx_v3_sdram_size((void *)MX51_ESDCTL_BASE_ADDR, 0);
> -	if (size == SZ_256M)
> -		size += imx_v3_sdram_size((void *)MX51_ESDCTL_BASE_ADDR, 1);
> -
> -	barebox_arm_entry(base, size, boarddata);
> +	barebox_arm_entry(MX51_CSD0_BASE_ADDR, SZ_128M, boarddata);
>  }

Here SDRAM size detection is disabled completely and instead 128Mib is
assumed.

>  
> +static int imx51_memory_init(void)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *esdctl = IOMEM(MX51_ESDCTL_BASE_ADDR + IMX_ESDCTL1);
> +	unsigned long add, size = SZ_128M;
> +
> +	add = get_ram_size((ulong *)(MX51_CSD0_BASE_ADDR + SZ_128M), SZ_128M);

Ok, I think the intention here is to test whether we actually have more
than 128Mib. This won't work. get_ram_size works by detecting where in
memory we have mirrored regions. So in case you have 128Mib of real
memory you will detect 128Mib above not knowing that you test the
mirrored region of your actual memory.

> +	if (add) {
> +		size += add;
> +		if (readl(esdctl) & ESDCTL0_SDE)
> +			size += get_ram_size((ulong *)MX51_CSD1_BASE_ADDR, SZ_256M);
> +
> +	}
> +
> +	arm_add_mem_device("ram0", MX51_CSD0_BASE_ADDR, size);

With this patch you imply that imx_v3_sdram_size does not work which was
never mentioned in the thread you reference.

Can you please post:

- Which values the sdram controller is programmed with
- How much memory you really have
- what barebox detects

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-26 10:21 Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 10:48 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-04-26 11:12   ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 11:42     ` Sascha Hauer
2013-04-26 11:50       ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 21:48         ` [PATCH] Fix ccxmx51 SDRAM size detection Sascha Hauer
2013-04-26 21:48           ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: i.MX: Allow disabling SDRAM autodetection Sascha Hauer
2013-04-26 21:48           ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: i.MX: ccxmx51: detect SDRAM size by board id Sascha Hauer
2013-05-07 11:45             ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-05-08  6:25               ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-07 12:39             ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-05-07 12:46               ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-05-07 16:06                 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-27  4:41           ` [PATCH] Fix ccxmx51 SDRAM size detection Alexander Shiyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130426104806.GR32299@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shc_work@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox