From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: at91 gpio: Fix possible null pointer dereference
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:48:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426204805.GV32299@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130426165946.GI13393@game.jcrosoft.org>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 06:59:46PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 20:41 Fri 26 Apr , Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> > index c2618c7..0e39a52 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> > @@ -185,10 +185,10 @@ static struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops at91sam9x5_ops = {
> > int at91_mux_pin(unsigned pin, enum at91_mux mux, int use_pullup)
> > {
> > struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = pin_to_controller(pin);
> > - void __iomem *pio = at91_gpio->regbase;
> > + void __iomem *pio;
> > + struct device_d *dev;
> > unsigned mask = pin_to_mask(pin);
> > int bank = pin_to_bank(pin);
> > - struct device_d *dev = at91_gpio->chip.dev;
> so crash
means what? the original code derefences at91_gpio...
> >
> > if (!at91_gpio)
> > return -EINVAL;
...and then checks if at91_gpio is valid which makes no sense.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-26 16:41 [PATCH 1/9] console: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: at91 gpio: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:59 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-26 20:48 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: at91 smc: Fix possible uninitialized variable Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:59 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-26 17:09 ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 20:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] MCI: atmel: Fix possible null pointer dereference Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] MCI: imx-esdhc: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 20:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-04-27 4:45 ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] MCI: imx: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] NAND: imx: Fix memory leak Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] Serial: mpc5xxx: Fix setup mode at port initialization Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-30 7:39 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-04-30 7:46 ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] MCI: imx-esdhc: Remove now unneeded check Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-26 20:57 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130426204805.GV32299@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox