From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UbTS7-0001gH-9z for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 12 May 2013 10:24:28 +0000 Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 12:24:04 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20130512102404.GV32299@pengutronix.de> References: <1368093171-17845-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130512075644.GT20989@pengutronix.de> <20130512111246.72df8918@skate> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130512111246.72df8918@skate> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Basic support for Armada 370/XP SOCs To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Lior Amsalem , barebox@lists.infradead.org, Willy Tarreau , Ezequiel Garcia On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:12:46AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Sascha Hauer, > > On Sun, 12 May 2013 09:56:44 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > There is a problem with this series: It doesn't build without the > > addtional binary needed for the kwb tool. Can we make creating a kwb > > image optional so that we are able to build the defconfigs without > > additional dependencies? > > Hum, right. So we should make the default build target to not build > barebox.{kwb,kwbuart} and only make barebox.bin? > > Or there should be a config option somewhere to say "I also want > the .{kwb,kwbuart} images generated" ? > > Neither of those are ideal, because most likely people will not notice > the possibility of building the .{kwb,kwbuart} images, but I understand > the concern of not being able to build defconfigs. > > Tell me which solution you prefer, and I'll send a patch that > implements it. How about a warning like: "Warning: 'plathome-openblocks-ax3-binary.0' does not exist. Not building barebox.kwb" Also not an ideal solution, but I think there is no really good way to solve this other than including the binary in the tree which probably has some licensing issues. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox