mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH urgent] ARM: fix the memset fix
@ 2013-05-23  6:31 Sascha Hauer
  2013-05-23  6:32 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2013-05-23  6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox; +Cc: Nicolas Pitre

From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>

From Kernel commit 418df63a ARM: 7670/1: fix the memset fix

| Commit 455bd4c430b0 ("ARM: 7668/1: fix memset-related crashes caused by
| recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations") attempted to fix a compliance issue
| with the memset return value.  However the memset itself became broken
| by that patch for misaligned pointers.
|
| This fixes the above by branching over the entry code from the
| misaligned fixup code to avoid reloading the original pointer.
|
| Also, because the function entry alignment is wrong in the Thumb mode
| compilation, that fixup code is moved to the end.
|
| While at it, the entry instructions are slightly reworked to help dual
| issue pipelines.
|
| Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
| Tested-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
| Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---

This was reported one of our customers. One effect was that the
md5sum implementation produced wrong results.

 arch/arm/lib/memset.S | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/memset.S b/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
index 5e35d7f..c4d2672 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
@@ -14,31 +14,15 @@
 
 	.text
 	.align	5
-	.word	0
-
-1:	subs	r2, r2, #4		@ 1 do we have enough
-	blt	5f			@ 1 bytes to align with?
-	cmp	r3, #2			@ 1
-	strltb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
-	strleb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
-	strb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
-	add	r2, r2, r3		@ 1 (r2 = r2 - (4 - r3))
-/*
- * The pointer is now aligned and the length is adjusted.  Try doing the
- * memset again.
- */
 
 ENTRY(memset)
-/*
- * Preserve the contents of r0 for the return value.
- */
-	mov	ip, r0
-	ands	r3, ip, #3		@ 1 unaligned?
-	bne	1b			@ 1
+	ands	r3, r0, #3		@ 1 unaligned?
+	mov	ip, r0			@ preserve r0 as return value
+	bne	6f			@ 1
 /*
  * we know that the pointer in ip is aligned to a word boundary.
  */
-	orr	r1, r1, r1, lsl #8
+1:	orr	r1, r1, r1, lsl #8
 	orr	r1, r1, r1, lsl #16
 	mov	r3, r1
 	cmp	r2, #16
@@ -127,5 +111,14 @@ ENTRY(memset)
 	tst	r2, #1
 	strneb	r1, [ip], #1
 	mov	pc, lr
+
+6:	subs	r2, r2, #4		@ 1 do we have enough
+	blt	5b			@ 1 bytes to align with?
+	cmp	r3, #2			@ 1
+	strltb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
+	strleb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
+	strb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
+	add	r2, r2, r3		@ 1 (r2 = r2 - (4 - r3))
+	b	1b
 ENDPROC(memset)
 
-- 
1.8.2.rc2


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH urgent] ARM: fix the memset fix
  2013-05-23  6:31 [PATCH urgent] ARM: fix the memset fix Sascha Hauer
@ 2013-05-23  6:32 ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2013-05-23  6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox; +Cc: Nicolas Pitre


Hi Nico,

ignore this one, you were not meant to be on Cc.

Sascha

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:31:15AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> 
> From Kernel commit 418df63a ARM: 7670/1: fix the memset fix
> 
> | Commit 455bd4c430b0 ("ARM: 7668/1: fix memset-related crashes caused by
> | recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations") attempted to fix a compliance issue
> | with the memset return value.  However the memset itself became broken
> | by that patch for misaligned pointers.
> |
> | This fixes the above by branching over the entry code from the
> | misaligned fixup code to avoid reloading the original pointer.
> |
> | Also, because the function entry alignment is wrong in the Thumb mode
> | compilation, that fixup code is moved to the end.
> |
> | While at it, the entry instructions are slightly reworked to help dual
> | issue pipelines.
> |
> | Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> | Tested-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
> | Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> 
> This was reported one of our customers. One effect was that the
> md5sum implementation produced wrong results.
> 
>  arch/arm/lib/memset.S | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/memset.S b/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
> index 5e35d7f..c4d2672 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
> @@ -14,31 +14,15 @@
>  
>  	.text
>  	.align	5
> -	.word	0
> -
> -1:	subs	r2, r2, #4		@ 1 do we have enough
> -	blt	5f			@ 1 bytes to align with?
> -	cmp	r3, #2			@ 1
> -	strltb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
> -	strleb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
> -	strb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
> -	add	r2, r2, r3		@ 1 (r2 = r2 - (4 - r3))
> -/*
> - * The pointer is now aligned and the length is adjusted.  Try doing the
> - * memset again.
> - */
>  
>  ENTRY(memset)
> -/*
> - * Preserve the contents of r0 for the return value.
> - */
> -	mov	ip, r0
> -	ands	r3, ip, #3		@ 1 unaligned?
> -	bne	1b			@ 1
> +	ands	r3, r0, #3		@ 1 unaligned?
> +	mov	ip, r0			@ preserve r0 as return value
> +	bne	6f			@ 1
>  /*
>   * we know that the pointer in ip is aligned to a word boundary.
>   */
> -	orr	r1, r1, r1, lsl #8
> +1:	orr	r1, r1, r1, lsl #8
>  	orr	r1, r1, r1, lsl #16
>  	mov	r3, r1
>  	cmp	r2, #16
> @@ -127,5 +111,14 @@ ENTRY(memset)
>  	tst	r2, #1
>  	strneb	r1, [ip], #1
>  	mov	pc, lr
> +
> +6:	subs	r2, r2, #4		@ 1 do we have enough
> +	blt	5b			@ 1 bytes to align with?
> +	cmp	r3, #2			@ 1
> +	strltb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
> +	strleb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
> +	strb	r1, [ip], #1		@ 1
> +	add	r2, r2, r3		@ 1 (r2 = r2 - (4 - r3))
> +	b	1b
>  ENDPROC(memset)
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.2.rc2
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-23  6:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-23  6:31 [PATCH urgent] ARM: fix the memset fix Sascha Hauer
2013-05-23  6:32 ` Sascha Hauer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox