From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 19.mo4.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.179.66] helo=mo4.mail-out.ovh.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Uyfki-0007v2-FQ for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:11:33 +0000 Received: from mail618.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4944C104F4A4 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:11:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:11:19 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Message-ID: <20130715101119.GH19197@ns203013.ovh.net> References: <1373453528-3723-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1373453528-3723-9-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <14050E29-1044-43D1-B240-2AE619C18CA6@jcrosoft.com> <20130710133424.GG516@pengutronix.de> <20130710143349.GB19197@ns203013.ovh.net> <20130710144240.GH516@pengutronix.de> <20130710155028.GC19197@ns203013.ovh.net> <20130710201713.GJ516@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130710201713.GJ516@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Add configurability via devicetree To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 22:17 Wed 10 Jul , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:50:28PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > It's the same binding, yes. > > > > > > > > I do not like to duplicate the information can de avoid this > > > > > > Which information? The Documentation? > > > > no the fact we need to describe the nor-partitions twice, for barebox and for > > linux in the DTB > > No, barebox should copy (or move) the partition nodes to where Linux > finds them before starting the kernel. This is not yet implemented > though. > > Another option of course is to do the obvious and put the partitions > under the mtd device in the first place. I decided against this since > I have the strong feeling that the hardware description should be > separated from clearly board (or project or usecase) specific partition > descriptions. here we need to be more generic as it's booloader specific not really barebox > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox