From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VN000-0000o6-QY for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:39:53 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:39:30 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20130920123930.GH30088@pengutronix.de> References: <20130920044518.GB1137@ns203013.ovh.net> <1379652377-20276-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20130920072313.GF30088@pengutronix.de> <20130920080127.GG1137@ns203013.ovh.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130920080127.GG1137@ns203013.ovh.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] misc: add bootcount framework To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:01:27AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:23 Fri 20 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > This 'framework' in it's current state doesn't make much sense. It > > doesn't even have support for reading the actual count back which I > > would see as one of the minimum requirements for this. > > I let the driver handle this > > we can move this here if you want If you want to make this a framework then make sure the users interact with the framework and not with the drivers. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox