Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] filetype: add Binary PacKage BPK type

From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Fargier Sylvain <sylvain.fargier@somfy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] filetype: add Binary PacKage BPK type
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:34:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924073437.GB30088@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379775256-29471-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fargier Sylvain <sylvain.fargier@somfy.com>
> ---
>  common/filetype.c  | 3 +++
>  include/filetype.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/filetype.c b/common/filetype.c
> index 59ea25a..ef4452d 100644
> --- a/common/filetype.c
> +++ b/common/filetype.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static const struct filetype_str filetype_str[] = {
>  	[filetype_png] = { "PNG image", "png" },
>  	[filetype_ext] = { "ext filesystem", "ext" },
>  	[filetype_gpt] = { "GUID Partition Table", "gpt" },
> +	[filetype_bpk] = { "Binary PacKage", "bpk" },

Can we have "Somfy Binary PacKage" here? As this file format is rather
exoctic I want to make sure we still know what this is in a few years.
Was the CamelCase 'PacKage' intended?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox