From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::232]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wcvtb-00030P-NV for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:03:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c13so710658eek.9 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:02:55 +0200 From: Alexander Aring Message-ID: <20140423120252.GA22616@omega> References: <1397131446-4816-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <20140423102540.GQ5858@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140423102540.GQ5858@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] memtest: small cleanup To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:04:03PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this are three patches to cleanup the memtest command. It removes the the first > > and last if condition in the sdram regions loop. It was stupid to handle it in > > that way but since then my skills are improved and it was long time on my list. > > > > I would be happy if somebody can test it with two banks, again... > > I tested it on a Karo TX25 which seems to work fine. > > Applied, thanks > Thanks. - Alex _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox