From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XhaWM-00033Y-OR for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:46:55 +0000 From: Juergen Borleis Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:47:17 +0200 References: <1414104361-15956-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <201410240950.21973.jbe@pengutronix.de> <20141024081949.GO8316@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20141024081949.GO8316@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201410241047.17687.jbe@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mxs: iomux-imx23/imx28: unify mode definition To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Cc: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Hi Uwe, On Friday 24 October 2014 10:19:49 Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > [...] > > > > Looks more like a strange implementation by myself. Did not remember why > > I have done it in this way... > > When Sascha is happy with the changes in this series we can clean that > up. > > You didn't test that on an i.MX23 machine, do you? Not yet. I could test it on our i.MX23 based Chumby (when I will have the t= ime = to do so...) jbe -- = Pengutronix e.K. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0| Juergen Borleis =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | Industrial Linux Solutions =A0 =A0 =A0| http://www.pengutroni= x.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox