From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YIYxY-0001qI-AF for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 08:35:48 +0000 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:35:26 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20150203083526.GH12209@pengutronix.de> References: <1422709810-30622-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20150202091705.GW12209@pengutronix.de> <8761bkb0ri.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8761bkb0ri.fsf@free.fr> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc1111: add 16 bits accessors, allow address shift To: Robert Jarzmik Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:56:33PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Sascha Hauer writes: > > > Applied all, thanks > > > > Sascha > Thanks Sascha, > > I noticed that in my patchset I moved the "struct smc91111_accessors {...}" from > smc9111.c to include/net/smc91111.h. > > This was when I thought the accessors would be settable from platform code. Do > you want me to send an incremental patch to reverse this ? That would be great, yes. You can commit the patch with --fixup=commitish which makes it easy for me to fixup the correct patch. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox