From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YcvZF-0000zX-C4 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:46:54 +0000 Received: by lbcmq2 with SMTP id mq2so11455362lbc.0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:50:51 +0300 From: Antony Pavlov Message-Id: <20150331155051.5c09f9d591bd04b84423232d@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <66FFD9910051464CB128685455FE423D2FB77B@XMB-DCFR-31.europe.corp.altran.com> References: <1588230.G27jqyn2gQ@linux-small.site> <20150228210101.cfcbb70a472f7a910e19aada@gmail.com> <5243411.sF5OIl90BO@linux-small.site> <20150301165425.ae74fe890992a1a47aac4294@gmail.com> <66FFD9910051464CB128685455FE423D2FB77B@XMB-DCFR-31.europe.corp.altran.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: picotcp barebox integration To: DI PEDE Michele Cc: barebox , LACAMERA Daniele Hi! I have just published latest picotcp-enabled barebox. Please see my picotcp.20150331 branch in my github barebox repo (https://github.com/frantony/barebox/tree/picotcp.20150331). This version is based on latest barebox-next and latest picotcp-development. Here is barebox picotcp network features: * network interfaces and the 'ifconfig' command to rule them; * the 'route' command to see current picotcp route table; * the 'picoping' command to use picotcp ping support (also now bareb= ox responds to ping requests); * the 'dhclient' command to use picotcp dhcp client; (new) * picotcp-based tftp filesystem support. Here is note/todo list: 1. tftp write operation is not supported; 2. with picotcp we can't easely use 'tftp' command with old syntax (no $.serverip anymore); 3. just now picotcp-based tftp file transfer is 5 times slower than old realisation (partialy it is my bad, e.g. extra memory copy operati= on is used for code simplification); 4. picotcp has dns support, but just now it is unused in barebox; = 5. no nfs support in picotcp (should we can keep current barebox nfs supp= ort on top of barebox UDP support?). --=A0 Best regards, =A0 Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox