From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on next (Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 08:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504062919.GF6325@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55450062.6050205@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Hi Ezequiel,
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On 03/17/2015 03:25 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > In devices_shutdown we should call the busses remove function
> > which in turn calls the drivers remove function. Otherwise for
> > example PCI devices never get removed since they do not have
> > a remove function but a pcidev->remove function instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/driver.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
> > index 453966b..590c97c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
> > @@ -399,8 +399,8 @@ void devices_shutdown(void)
> > struct device_d *dev;
> >
> > list_for_each_entry(dev, &active, active) {
> > - if (dev->driver->remove)
> > - dev->driver->remove(dev);
> > + if (dev->bus->remove)
> > + dev->bus->remove(dev);
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
>
> This commit caused a regression on the Openblocks A6 board, which now freezes
> when calling devices_shutdown. The problem is that calling bus->remove makes
> the remove() of the PHY driver called twice.
>
> This happened because the mdio bus device (mdio-mvebu) was registered first,
> and the phy0 device was be registered later, and attached to the mdio bus.
>
> Upon device shutdown, when iterating through the active device list,
> the phy0 device is removed before mdio-mvebu. Then, when the mdio bus device
> is removed, the phy0 device is removed again, here:
>
> mdio_bus_remove(on mdio-mvebu)
> mvebu_mdio_remove
> mdiobus_unregister
> unregister_device
> mdio_bus_remove(on phy0)
>
> This is currently the case for the Kirkwood Openblocks A6 board, where a double
> free(dev->cdev.name) in mdio_bus_remove causes a silent freeze when booting
> Linux.
Too bad that happened. I believe the following fixes this, but I have no
hardware to test this on. Could you give this a test? I'll delay the
outstanding release until this is solved.
Sascha
----------------------------8<---------------------------
From 15422e3435b0151f1b5d753b19a8578210da9d04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 08:16:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] net: phy: Do not double remove phy device
This fixes: 80264a8 driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove
On mvebu it happens that:
Upon device shutdown, when iterating through the active device list,
the phy0 device is removed before mdio-mvebu. Then, when the mdio bus
device is removed, the phy0 device is removed again, here:
mdio_bus_remove(on mdio-mvebu)
mvebu_mdio_remove
mdiobus_unregister
unregister_device
mdio_bus_remove(on phy0)
Fix this by setting the mdio busses phy_map[phy->addr] to NULL when
unregistering the phy device, so that mdiobus_unregister no longer
finds a valid phy_device when iterating over the busses device list.
Reported-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
index f526cfc..0959c45 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
@@ -331,12 +331,14 @@ static void mdio_bus_remove(struct device_d *_dev)
{
struct phy_device *dev = to_phy_device(_dev);
struct phy_driver *drv = to_phy_driver(_dev->driver);
+ struct mii_bus *bus = dev->bus;
if (drv->remove)
drv->remove(dev);
free(dev->cdev.name);
devfs_remove(&dev->cdev);
+ bus->phy_map[dev->addr] = NULL;
}
struct bus_type mdio_bus_type = {
--
2.1.4
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 6:25 [PATCH 1/3] driver: fix device remove order Sascha Hauer
2015-03-17 6:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] driver: Call remove function only when available Sascha Hauer
2015-03-17 6:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove Sascha Hauer
2015-05-02 16:50 ` Regression on next (Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove) Ezequiel Garcia
2015-05-04 6:29 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2015-05-05 11:44 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504062919.GF6325@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox