* [RFC] Barebox shutdown hooks
@ 2015-06-12 9:41 Herve Codina
2015-06-15 5:23 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Herve Codina @ 2015-06-12 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
I try to find a way to perform some tasks on barebox leaving (ie last step of go command or boot/bootm command)
and i look at shutdown_barebox (common/startup.c)
This function is :
---- 8< -----
void shutdown_barebox(void)
{
devices_shutdown();
#ifdef ARCH_SHUTDOWN
arch_shutdown();
#endif
if (board_shutdown)
board_shutdown();
}
---- 8< -----
I have several questions :
1) Why board_shutdown is called after arch_shutdown.
arch shutdown is supposed to do stuf like disabling mmu, flushing cache, ...
Don't you think that board_shutdown should be between devices_shutdown and arch_shutdown ?
2) What about the ability to have hooks for shutdown with all resources available
For my tasks, i need devices available. What do you thing about a new "early_shutdown" called before devices_shutdown.
barebox_shutdown will become :
void shutdown_barebox(void)
{
early_shutdown();
devices_shutdown();
#ifdef ARCH_SHUTDOWN
arch_shutdown();
#endif
if (board_shutdown)
board_shutdown();
}
for early_shutdown itself, i would give flexibility. I thing about 2 way :
2.1) register shutdown hooks
Use same mechanism as fixing up device tree :
early_shutdown_register function to register hook
and iterator calling all registered hooks in early_shutdown
2.2) exitcall
Use same mechanism as initcall functions :
Use a specific section to store exit hooks table. A macro early_exitcall (same mechanism as xxxx_initcall macro) will be used to do this.
Iterate on each hook in this section in early_shutdown (same mechanism as initcall in start_barebox).
Before doing a patch what do you think about this functionality and what way is preferred ?
Regards,
Herve
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Barebox shutdown hooks
2015-06-12 9:41 [RFC] Barebox shutdown hooks Herve Codina
@ 2015-06-15 5:23 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2015-06-15 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herve Codina; +Cc: barebox
Hi Herve,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> I try to find a way to perform some tasks on barebox leaving (ie last step of go command or boot/bootm command)
> and i look at shutdown_barebox (common/startup.c)
> This function is :
> ---- 8< -----
> void shutdown_barebox(void)
> {
> devices_shutdown();
> #ifdef ARCH_SHUTDOWN
> arch_shutdown();
> #endif
> if (board_shutdown)
> board_shutdown();
> }
> ---- 8< -----
>
> I have several questions :
>
> 1) Why board_shutdown is called after arch_shutdown.
> arch shutdown is supposed to do stuf like disabling mmu, flushing cache, ...
> Don't you think that board_shutdown should be between devices_shutdown and arch_shutdown ?
You are probably right. Only one single board implements board_shutdown
anyway, so I guess it's just where it suited the original author.
>
> 2) What about the ability to have hooks for shutdown with all resources available
> For my tasks, i need devices available. What do you thing about a new "early_shutdown" called before devices_shutdown.
> barebox_shutdown will become :
> void shutdown_barebox(void)
> {
> early_shutdown();
> devices_shutdown();
> #ifdef ARCH_SHUTDOWN
> arch_shutdown();
> #endif
> if (board_shutdown)
> board_shutdown();
> }
>
> for early_shutdown itself, i would give flexibility. I thing about 2 way :
>
> 2.1) register shutdown hooks
> Use same mechanism as fixing up device tree :
> early_shutdown_register function to register hook
> and iterator calling all registered hooks in early_shutdown
>
> 2.2) exitcall
> Use same mechanism as initcall functions :
> Use a specific section to store exit hooks table. A macro early_exitcall (same mechanism as xxxx_initcall macro) will be used to do this.
> Iterate on each hook in this section in early_shutdown (same mechanism as initcall in start_barebox).
I vote for 2.2). It has the smaller runtime overhead and we can hook
the existing devices_shutdown, arch_shutdown and board_shutdown into
that mechanism aswell.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-15 5:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-12 9:41 [RFC] Barebox shutdown hooks Herve Codina
2015-06-15 5:23 ` Sascha Hauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox