From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Anton Bondarenko <anton.bondarenko.sama@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: wait for link OK after successfull autonegotiation
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:00:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151102080032.GJ25308@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446296872-1592-2-git-send-email-anton.bondarenko.sama@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:07:52PM +0100, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
> It may take some time for PHY to indicate link OK status after
> autonegotiation completed. This change addresses this case
> and prevent network commands fails due to the delay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Bondarenko <anton.bondarenko.sama@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index 2b3c5e2..73569f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -502,13 +502,17 @@ int phy_wait_aneg_done(struct phy_device *phydev)
> return 0;
>
> while (!is_timeout(start, PHY_AN_TIMEOUT * SECOND)) {
> - if (phy_aneg_done(phydev) > 0) {
> - phydev->link = 1;
> + if (phy_aneg_done(phydev) > 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + genphy_update_link(phydev);
> + while (!is_timeout(start, PHY_AN_TIMEOUT * SECOND)) {
> + if (phydev->link == 1)
> return 0;
> - }
> + genphy_update_link(phydev);
> }
The additional call to genphy_update_link() before the loop shouldn't be
necessary, right? Or to be 100% correct you could use a do {} while loop
to make sure to always call genphy_update_link() at least once.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-02 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-31 13:07 [PATCH] Improve PHY AutoNeg procedure Anton Bondarenko
2015-10-31 13:07 ` [PATCH] net: phy: wait for link OK after successfull autonegotiation Anton Bondarenko
2015-11-02 8:00 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151102080032.GJ25308@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=anton.bondarenko.sama@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox