mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>
Cc: barebox <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: MCI bus-width host caps via device tree don't work properly for dw and imx
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151113102851.GF8526@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447374984.4553.133.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local>

Hi Trent,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote:
> I found my 4-bit connected eMMC chip wasn't working because barebox was
> trying to run it in 8-bit mode.  I had the proper bus-width property in
> the device tree, but this doesn't work.
> 
> The problem is that mci_of_parse() uses bus-width to _add_ 8-bit and/or
> 4-bit caps to the host.  It doesn't remove any host_caps the driver
> already has set.  So if the driver supports 8-bit but the DT bus-width
> is 4, you still get a driver that thinks 8-bit will work.
> 
> You can see this in dw_mmc.c, dw_mmc_probe() sets:
> host->mci.host_caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA
> then later
> mci_of_parse(&host->mci);
> return mci_register(&host->mci);
> 
> The mci_of_parse call will not remove the 4 and 8 bits caps.  There is
> the same problem in imx-esdhc.c.  The other two users of mci_of_parse,
> mxs.c and tegra-sdmmc.c, don't have this problem, since they don't set
> any bus-width host_caps in the driver and depend on the DT or
> platform_data to have this info.
> 
> With drivers split 50/50, which is the right way?  Don't have the driver
> report what bits it supports and depend on the device tree to have that
> information?  Or have of_mci_parse remove widths that aren't indicated
> as supported in the DT, so that the DT can remove widths the hardware
> indicates it supports.

I think the resulting flags should be the subset of what all components
can do, that is (driver_flags & devicetree_flags & card_flags).

So mci_of_parse() should IMO clear the MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA flag if the
bus-width property is set to 4.

You should encounter the same problem under Linux, right?

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-13 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-13  0:36 Trent Piepho
2015-11-13 10:28 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2015-11-13 18:54   ` Trent Piepho
2015-11-16  6:32     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-11-16 18:26       ` Trent Piepho
2015-11-17  8:09         ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151113102851.GF8526@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tpiepho@kymetacorp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox