From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>
Cc: barebox <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: MCI bus-width host caps via device tree don't work properly for dw and imx
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:32:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151116063223.GI8526@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447440856.4553.139.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:54:14PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 11:28 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > The mci_of_parse call will not remove the 4 and 8 bits caps. There is
> > > the same problem in imx-esdhc.c. The other two users of mci_of_parse,
> > > mxs.c and tegra-sdmmc.c, don't have this problem, since they don't set
> > > any bus-width host_caps in the driver and depend on the DT or
> > > platform_data to have this info.
> > >
> > > With drivers split 50/50, which is the right way? Don't have the driver
> > > report what bits it supports and depend on the device tree to have that
> > > information? Or have of_mci_parse remove widths that aren't indicated
> > > as supported in the DT, so that the DT can remove widths the hardware
> > > indicates it supports.
> >
> > I think the resulting flags should be the subset of what all components
> > can do, that is (driver_flags & devicetree_flags & card_flags).
> >
> > So mci_of_parse() should IMO clear the MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA flag if the
> > bus-width property is set to 4.
> >
> > You should encounter the same problem under Linux, right?
>
> Don't have the problem on Linux. The OF parsing works the same way, but
> the dw driver stats with 0 bus-width caps, like how mxs and tegra-sdmmc
> work.
>
> The linux dw_mmc driver allows "sub-drivers" to supply caps, and the
> Exynos4/5 driver adds CAP_8_BIT. Which is probably broken, as it
> doesn't add 4_BIT as well and will have the same problem with the device
> tree not being able to remove bus widths.
Ok, it seems the rationale behind the MMC_CAP_x_BIT_DATA is another one
than thought it is. The host driver cannot know how a card is actually
connected, so it should rely purely on the device tree bus-width
property. So dw_mmc.c should start with host->mci.host_caps = 0 in the
device tree case.
If this is changed we'll also have to fix the platform_data for dw_mmc,
it now needs a bus_width field to let ./arch/arm/mach-socfpga/xload.c
work in 4 bit mode.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-13 0:36 Trent Piepho
2015-11-13 10:28 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-11-13 18:54 ` Trent Piepho
2015-11-16 6:32 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2015-11-16 18:26 ` Trent Piepho
2015-11-17 8:09 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151116063223.GI8526@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tpiepho@kymetacorp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox