From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1a9VYc-000595-GU for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:13:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:12:48 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20151217101248.GE11966@pengutronix.de> References: <1449873185.26955.138.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> <1449873460.26955.140.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> <20151216105214.GV11966@pengutronix.de> <1450312315.26955.187.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1450312315.26955.187.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] environment: Support env from file in a file-system via device tree To: Trent Piepho Cc: barebox On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:31:55AM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 11:52 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:37:34PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > From d8f4428244b3c7009a6ef7d5a97a00747cd19472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Trent Piepho > > > Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:19:34 -0800 > > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] socfpga: Find partition with environment via device tree > > > > The subject in this mail is wrong. The correct subject is here, but 'git > > am' takes the one from the mail. > > IMAP and POP aren't supported at work so I can't use git send-email and > must instead manually import the patches into a mailer that supports > EWS. I must have forgotten to copy the subject on that one. > > > I thought over it and I am fine with the approach of putting the > > filename as an additional property into the barebox,environment node. > > > > Also I am fine with the "of_path: Fix bug with partitions, simply code" > > patch, only I can not find the commitish that broke the partition code. > > I used my local rebased branch by mistake, it should have been > 75b682795eafb2385556a9642f09e0af96a1264a > > > I somewhat lost track over your outstanding patches. Could you resend > > all of them in a single series? > > Ok. Have you considered using patchwork for this list? I've found it > pretty useful for keeping track of patches. I have tried it a few years ago, but never got really warm with it. patchwork requires some maintenance and usually I am quite happy with my workflow. Only sometimes when there are several updates to a patch, patches that do not really depend on each other but are still somehow related with each other it feels better when everything is resent freshly. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox