From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aqITX-0006sJ-DG for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:56:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:56:23 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20160413105623.GV9102@pengutronix.de> References: <20160408173040.GM9102@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: support of arm64 architecture To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Rapha=EBl?= Poggi Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Rapha=EBl Poggi wrote: > Hi, > = > Thank you for your answer. > = > At the beginning, I have tried to add arm64 specific code on the arm > architecture folder, but it becomes a mess... > = > Nevertheless, I can give an another try with this solution and then we > can decide. I think the end result should be that both architectures are merged, but maybe to get there it is easier to work with separated architectures in the mean time. Sascha -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox