From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1avOw4-0003KK-5B for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:51:20 +0000 From: Juergen Borleis Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:51:17 +0200 References: <1461653060-13481-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20160427092501.GT7860@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20160427092501.GT7860@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201604271451.17221.jbe@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: i.MX: increase barebox partition sizes To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wednesday 27 April 2016 11:25:01 Sascha Hauer wrote: > [...] > > Here the environment partition size is changed from 512kB to 128kB. > > Couldn't this cause issues? > > Normally the environment is much smaller, so I wouldn't expect issues > here. The alternative to making the environment smaller would be to move > other partitions to the back. This would probably hurt more, especially > since a regular fdisk starts the first partition at offset 1MiB. It hurts if the NAND's erase block size is 128 kiB and the block is marked = bad. = In the 512 kiB case this would shrink the environment to 384 kiB, in the 12= 8 = kiB case to 0. Or do I miss something? jb -- = Pengutronix e.K. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0| Juergen Borleis =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | Industrial Linux Solutions =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| http://= www.pengutronix.de/ =A0| _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox