From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bUomw-00043G-RR for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 05:32:19 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:31:57 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20160803053157.GF20657@pengutronix.de> References: <1468958994-10875-1-git-send-email-akurz@blala.de> <20160721061819.GQ20657@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd mc13xxx: add MC13892_REVISION_3_6 To: Alexander Kurz Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:54:05PM +0200, Alexander Kurz wrote: > Hi, > thanks for applying this quickly, unfortunately this patch is not > correct. > > The observed MC13892 is attached to a MC508 in two different variants of > e-book readers. When .max_speed_hz is set faster than 16MHz (default is > 20MHz since patch 6e18b3a48ee4), the device is identified as > > Found MC13892 ID: 0x0067fe [Rev: 3.6] > > while indeed this device is a > > Found MC13892 ID: 0x0045d4 [Rev: 2.4] > > Is it possible to drop this patch or should I post a revert patch on it? It's still in next, so I just dropped it. You can send a corrected patch if you wish. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox