From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cVwVU-0007AU-A2 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:31:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:30:50 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20170124083050.iry4xktcb5mapcqs@pengutronix.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: tftp get and last ack hanlding To: Yegor Yefremov Cc: barebox On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:01:04AM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > I'm using dnsmaq as tftp server. When I execute tftp file on barebox > 2016.07.0 I get the required file, but dnsmasq complains about missing > ACK (my interpretation of dnsmaq source code). If I'm performing the > same operation in Linux using busybox ftfp - everything is OK, i.e. > instead of "failed sending" I get "sent". Is this a desired barebox > tftp behavior? To answer this question: No, it's not a desired behaviour. It may be because of your network driver, but I also wouldn't wonder if the tftp code triggers this. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox