From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Alexander Kurz <akurz@blala.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: imx-usb-loader: implement DCD v2 check command
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:26:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222082637.ua4wmgswhrmqchzm@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487530678-7615-1-git-send-email-akurz@blala.de>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 07:57:58PM +0100, Alexander Kurz wrote:
> The DCD v2 check command supported by i.MX53 and later SoC polls a given
> memory location as long as a given condition is true.
> Enable imx-usb-loader to perform this check. When the timeout is hit,
> imx-usb-loader returns an error. For practical reasons the timeout
> computation will differ from the native implementation, since performing
> check commands via USB will be much slower compared to native processing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kurz <akurz@blala.de>
Nice work. Applied, thanks
Sascha
> ---
> scripts/imx/imx-usb-loader.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> scripts/imx/imx.h | 16 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/imx/imx-usb-loader.c b/scripts/imx/imx-usb-loader.c
> index 9de7bb3..4105ade 100644
> --- a/scripts/imx/imx-usb-loader.c
> +++ b/scripts/imx/imx-usb-loader.c
> @@ -798,6 +798,98 @@ static int do_dcd_v2_cmd_write(const unsigned char *dcd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int do_dcd_v2_cmd_check(const unsigned char *dcd)
> +{
> + uint32_t mask;
> + uint32_t poll_count = 0;
> + int bytes;
> + enum imx_dcd_v2_check_cond cond;
> + struct imx_dcd_v2_check *check = (struct imx_dcd_v2_check *) dcd;
> + switch (ntohs(check->length)) {
> + case 12:
> + /* poll indefinitely */
> + poll_count = 0xffffffff;
> + break;
> + case 16:
> + poll_count = ntohl(check->count);
> + if (poll_count == 0)
> + /* this command behaves as for NOP */
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + default:
> + fprintf(stderr, "Error: invalid DCD check length\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + switch (check->param & 7) {
> + case 1:
> + case 2:
> + case 4:
> + bytes = check->param & 7;
> + break;
> + default:
> + fprintf(stderr, "Error: invalid DCD check size\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + switch ((check->param & 0xf8) >> 3) {
> + case check_all_bits_clear:
> + case check_all_bits_set:
> + case check_any_bit_clear:
> + case check_any_bit_set:
> + cond = (check->param & 0xf8) >> 3;
> + break;
> + default:
> + fprintf(stderr, "Error: invalid DCD check condition\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + mask = ntohl(check->mask);
> +
> + fprintf(stderr, "DCD check condition %i on address 0x%x\n",
> + cond, ntohl(check->addr));
> + /* Reduce the poll count to some arbitrary practical limit.
> + Polling via SRP commands will be much slower compared to
> + polling when DCD is interpreted by the SOC microcode.
> + */
> + if (poll_count > 1000)
> + poll_count = 1000;
> +
> + while (poll_count > 0) {
> + uint32_t data = 0;
> + int ret = read_memory(ntohl(check->addr), &data, bytes);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + data &= mask;
> +
> + switch (cond) {
> + case check_all_bits_clear:
> + if (data != 0)
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + case check_all_bits_set:
> + if (data != mask)
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + case check_any_bit_clear:
> + if (data == mask)
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + case check_any_bit_set:
> + if (data == 0)
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + poll_count--;
> + }
> +
> + fprintf(stderr, "Error: timeout waiting for DCD check condition %i "
> + "on address 0x%08x to match 0x%08x\n", cond,
> + ntohl(check->addr), ntohl(check->mask));
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> static int process_dcd_table_ivt(const struct imx_flash_header_v2 *hdr,
> const unsigned char *file_start, unsigned cnt)
> {
> @@ -850,8 +942,7 @@ static int process_dcd_table_ivt(const struct imx_flash_header_v2 *hdr,
> ret = do_dcd_v2_cmd_write(dcd);
> break;
> case TAG_CHECK:
> - fprintf(stderr, "DCD check not implemented yet\n");
> - usleep(50000);
> + ret = do_dcd_v2_cmd_check(dcd);
> break;
> case TAG_UNLOCK:
> fprintf(stderr, "DCD unlock not implemented yet\n");
> diff --git a/scripts/imx/imx.h b/scripts/imx/imx.h
> index 57c7525..f32ae52 100644
> --- a/scripts/imx/imx.h
> +++ b/scripts/imx/imx.h
> @@ -95,4 +95,20 @@ struct imx_dcd_v2_write {
> struct imx_dcd_v2_write_rec data[MAX_RECORDS_DCD_V2];
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> +struct imx_dcd_v2_check {
> + uint8_t tag;
> + uint16_t length;
> + uint8_t param;
> + uint32_t addr;
> + uint32_t mask;
> + uint32_t count;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +enum imx_dcd_v2_check_cond {
> + check_all_bits_clear = 0,
> + check_all_bits_set = 1,
> + check_any_bit_clear = 2,
> + check_any_bit_set = 3,
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> int parse_config(struct config_data *data, const char *filename);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-19 18:57 Alexander Kurz
2017-02-22 8:26 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222082637.ua4wmgswhrmqchzm@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akurz@blala.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox