From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>,
cphealy@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] gpiolib: Add code to support "active low" GPIOs
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:11:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604031154.26663-3-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170604031154.26663-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
So far this particular aspect of various DT-bindings has been handled
on a per-driver basis. With this change, hopefully, we'll have a
single place to handle necessary logic inversions and eventually
would be able to migrate existing users as well as avoiding adding
redundant code to new drivers.
Cc: cphealy@gmail.com
Cc: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/gpio.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 1f57c76..28f6a5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(chip_list);
struct gpio_info {
struct gpio_chip *chip;
bool requested;
+ bool active_low;
char *label;
};
@@ -45,6 +46,15 @@ static struct gpio_info *gpio_to_desc(unsigned gpio)
return NULL;
}
+static int gpio_adjust_value(struct gpio_info *gi,
+ int value)
+{
+ if (value < 0)
+ return value;
+
+ return !!value ^ gi->active_low;
+}
+
int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
{
struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
@@ -69,6 +79,7 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
}
gi->requested = true;
+ gi->active_low = false;
gi->label = xstrdup(label);
done:
@@ -93,6 +104,7 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
gi->chip->ops->free(gi->chip, gpio - gi->chip->base);
gi->requested = false;
+ gi->active_low = false;
free(gi->label);
gi->label = NULL;
}
@@ -111,11 +123,20 @@ int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char *label)
if (err)
return err;
- if (flags & GPIOF_DIR_IN)
+ if (flags & GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW) {
+ struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
+ gi->active_low = true;
+ }
+
+ if (flags & GPIOF_DIR_IN) {
err = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
- else
+ } else if (flags & GPIOF_LOGICAL) {
+ err = gpio_direction_active(gpio,
+ !!(flags & GPIOF_INIT_ACTIVE));
+ } else {
err = gpio_direction_output(gpio,
- (flags & GPIOF_INIT_HIGH) ? 1 : 0);
+ !!(flags & GPIOF_INIT_HIGH));
+ }
if (err)
goto free_gpio;
@@ -178,6 +199,13 @@ void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_set_value);
+void gpio_set_active(unsigned gpio, bool value)
+{
+ struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
+ gpio_set_value(gpio, gpio_adjust_value(gi, value));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_set_active);
+
int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
{
struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
@@ -196,6 +224,13 @@ int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_get_value);
+int gpio_is_active(unsigned gpio)
+{
+ struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
+ return gpio_adjust_value(gi, gpio_get_value(gpio));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_is_active);
+
int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
@@ -215,6 +250,13 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_direction_output);
+int gpio_direction_active(unsigned gpio, bool value)
+{
+ struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
+ return gpio_direction_output(gpio, gpio_adjust_value(gi, value));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_direction_active);
+
int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
{
struct gpio_info *gi = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
@@ -334,7 +376,7 @@ static int do_gpiolib(int argc, char *argv[])
printf(" GPIO %*d: %*s %*s %*s %s\n", 4, i,
3, (dir < 0) ? "unk" : ((dir == GPIOF_DIR_IN) ? "in" : "out"),
3, (val < 0) ? "unk" : ((val == 0) ? "lo" : "hi"),
- 9, gi->requested ? "true" : "false",
+ 12, gi->requested ? (gi->active_low ? "active low" : "true") : "false",
(gi->requested && gi->label) ? gi->label : "");
}
diff --git a/include/gpio.h b/include/gpio.h
index 7b3f512..56aae22 100644
--- a/include/gpio.h
+++ b/include/gpio.h
@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value);
int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio);
int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value);
int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio);
+
+void gpio_set_active(unsigned gpio, bool state);
+int gpio_is_active(unsigned gpio);
+int gpio_direction_active(unsigned gpio, bool state);
+
#else
static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
@@ -22,6 +27,18 @@ static inline int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+static inline void gpio_set_active(unsigned gpio, int value)
+{
+}
+static inline int gpio_is_active(unsigned gpio)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline int gpio_direction_active(unsigned gpio, int value)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
#endif
#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 256
@@ -45,6 +62,14 @@ static inline int gpio_is_valid(int gpio)
#define GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW (GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_LOW)
#define GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH (GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_HIGH)
+#define GPIOF_LOGICAL BIT(2)
+#define GPIOF_ACTIVE_HIGH GPIOF_LOGICAL
+#define GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW (BIT(3) | GPIOF_LOGICAL)
+#define GPIOF_INIT_INACTIVE GPIOF_LOGICAL
+#define GPIOF_INIT_ACTIVE (GPIOF_LOGICAL | GPIOF_INIT_HIGH)
+#define GPIOF_OUT_INIT_ACTIVE (GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_ACTIVE)
+#define GPIOF_OUT_INIT_INACTIVE (GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_INACTIVE)
+
/**
* struct gpio - a structure describing a GPIO with configuration
* @gpio: the GPIO number
--
2.9.4
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-04 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-04 3:11 [PATCH v3 0/4] GPIO "active low", hogging and usb-nop-xceive 'reset-gpio' support Andrey Smirnov
2017-06-04 3:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] gpio-imx: Do not use gpio_set_value() Andrey Smirnov
2017-06-04 3:11 ` Andrey Smirnov [this message]
2017-06-04 3:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] gpiolib: Add support for GPIO "hog" nodes Andrey Smirnov
2017-06-04 3:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] usb-nop-xceiv: Add support for 'reset-gpios' binding Andrey Smirnov
2017-06-06 6:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] GPIO "active low", hogging and usb-nop-xceive 'reset-gpio' support Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170604031154.26663-3-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--to=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
--cc=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox