From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Matt Reimer <mreimer@sdgsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: omap: Fix BCH bit correction
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:45:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607064508.lau5rlqb5k6hslf3@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496765425-9702-1-git-send-email-d.schultz@phytec.de>
+Cc Matt Reimer <mreimer@sdgsystems.com>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Daniel Schultz wrote:
> After commit dec7b4d2bf9 was applied our barebox only corrected the
> first 512 Bytes of NAND pages.
>
> This patch separates between Hamming and BCH when finding out the
> eccsteps, because BCH always works with 2kB pages.
>
> Before this patch:
>
> barebox@Phytec phyCORE AM335x:/ nand_bitflip -r -n 5 /dev/nand0.barebox
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 5 @ 1796
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 6 @ 1258
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 5 @ 1062
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 2 @ 1399
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 6 @ 1243
> No bitflips found on block 0, offset 0x00000000
> barebox@Phytec phyCORE AM335x:/ nand_bitflip -r -n 5 /dev/nand0.barebox
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 2 @ 872
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 4 @ 252
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 3 @ 568
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 2 @ 247
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 5 @ 401
> page at block 0, offset 0x00000000 has 3 bitflips
>
> After this patch:
>
> barebox@Phytec phyCORE AM335x:/ nand_bitflip -r -n 5 /dev/nand0.barebox
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 2 @ 1962
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 0 @ 1563
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 0 @ 1808
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 6 @ 1460
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 7 @ 2034
> page at block 0, offset 0x00000000 has 5 bitflips
> barebox@Phytec phyCORE AM335x:/ nand_bitflip -r -n 5 /dev/nand0.barebox
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 1 @ 1352
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 7 @ 1542
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 2 @ 1021
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 7 @ 691
> nand0.barebox: Flipping bit 6 @ 1196
> page at block 0, offset 0x00000000 has 10 bitflips, needs cleanup
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> index 05c8486..61220da 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> @@ -302,10 +302,17 @@ static int omap_correct_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
> unsigned int err_loc[8];
> int bitflip_count;
> int bch_max_err;
> + int eccsteps;
>
> - int eccsteps = (nand->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) &&
> - (nand->ecc.size == 2048) ? 4 : 1;
> int eccsize = oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes;
> + if (oinfo->ecc_mode == OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_HW_ROMCODE)
This is wrong. When in Hamming ECC mode you shouldn't get into this
function. The test should always fail.
> + if ((nand->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) &&
> + (nand->ecc.size == 2048))
> + eccsteps = 4;
> + else
> + eccsteps = 1;
The question is why ecc.size is set to the wrong value in the first
place:
case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW:
...
oinfo->nand.ecc.size = 512 * 4;
This seems to be wrong. The BCH controller works in 512 Byte chunks, so
ecc.size should be 512. This would make the special cases in
omap_correct_bch() unnecessary.
In dec7b4d2bf9 Matt said:
| The fix is to pull over a bit of code from the kernel's
| omap_correct_data() that sets eccsteps = 4 when the page size is 2048
| bytes and hardware ECC is being used.
In fact, this piece is in the kernel code:
/* Ex NAND_ECC_HW12_2048 */
if ((info->nand.ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) &&
(info->nand.ecc.size == 2048))
blockCnt = 4;
else
blockCnt = 1;
I just suspect this is never used, because ecc.size is correctly set to 512 in
all cases. Then ecc.steps results in 4 for 2k page sizes and the framework correctly
iterates over the ecc steps.
Please give the attached test a try. It's completely untested.
Sascha
-------------------------------------8<---------------------------------
From 34bbcd911513e9031786a3c0f12e83ee9e904b42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:42:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand_omap_gpmc: Fix ecc size
The ECC size for BCH correction is always 512 byte. Correct the ecc.size
for the OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW mode from 2048 to 512. This change will
let the framework iterate over the 4 ecc steps and we no longer need
special cases in omap_correct_bch().
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
index e18ce6358a..a35ed1f093 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
@@ -303,8 +303,7 @@ static int omap_correct_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
int bitflip_count;
int bch_max_err;
- int eccsteps = (nand->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) &&
- (nand->ecc.size == 2048) ? 4 : 1;
+ int eccsteps = nand->ecc.steps;
int eccsize = oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes;
switch (oinfo->ecc_mode) {
@@ -765,8 +764,8 @@ static int omap_gpmc_eccmode(struct gpmc_nand_info *oinfo,
offset - omap_oobinfo.eccbytes;
break;
case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW:
- oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes = 13 * 4;
- oinfo->nand.ecc.size = 512 * 4;
+ oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes = 13;
+ oinfo->nand.ecc.size = 512;
oinfo->nand.ecc.strength = BCH8_MAX_ERROR;
omap_oobinfo.oobfree->offset = offset;
omap_oobinfo.oobfree->length = minfo->oobsize -
--
2.11.0
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 16:10 Daniel Schultz
2017-06-07 6:45 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2017-06-07 6:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-06-07 6:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-06-09 8:17 ` Daniel Schultz
2017-06-09 9:08 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-06-09 13:28 ` Daniel Schultz
2017-06-12 13:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-06-13 11:50 ` Daniel Schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607064508.lau5rlqb5k6hslf3@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=d.schultz@phytec.de \
--cc=mreimer@sdgsystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox