mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
To: s.hauer@pengutronix.de, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
Subject: [PATCH 05/16] ratp: completely ignore RST flagged packets in behavior G
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:14:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170615111420.5318-6-aleksander@aleksander.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170615111420.5318-1-aleksander@aleksander.es>

The reference says:

    This procedure represents the behavior of the CLOSED state of a
    connection. All incoming packets are discarded. If the packet
    had the RST flag set take no action. Otherwise it is necessary
    to build a RST packet.

So, skip building the RST packet if the incoming one had RST set.

Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
---
 lib/ratp.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/ratp.c b/lib/ratp.c
index 43b8b04dc..d3c252047 100644
--- a/lib/ratp.c
+++ b/lib/ratp.c
@@ -1033,6 +1033,9 @@ static int ratp_behaviour_g(struct ratp_internal *ri, void *pkt)
 
 	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
 
+	if (hdr->control & RATP_CONTROL_RST)
+		return 0;
+
 	control = RATP_CONTROL_RST;
 
 	if (hdr->control & RATP_CONTROL_ACK)
-- 
2.13.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-15 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-15 11:14 [PATCH 00/16] RATP logic fixes and improvements Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 01/16] ratp: add missing transition to SYN-RECEIVED in behavior B Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 02/16] ratp: avoid unnecessary variable initializations Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 03/16] ratp: send missing RST in behavior C2 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 04/16] ratp: add missing RST flag in behavior G Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` Aleksander Morgado [this message]
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 06/16] ratp: fix data presence check Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 07/16] ratp: fix single byte sending flagged with SO Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 08/16] ratp: remove bogus data checks in behavior C2 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 09/16] ratp: remove FIXME comment: FIN always requires ACK Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 10/16] ratp: fix sending ACKs without data Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 11/16] ratp: consolidate ratp_sn_expected() and ratp_an_expected() Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 12/16] ratp: prefer using ratp_send_ack() in behaviour I1 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 13/16] ratp: send initial data in behaviour B if any pending Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 14/16] ratp: don't ignore data that may arrive in behaviour H1 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 15/16] ratp: consolidate setting the next AN or SN flags Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 16/16] ratp: user close may happen in SYN-RECEIVED state Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-19  6:46 ` [PATCH 00/16] RATP logic fixes and improvements Sascha Hauer
2017-06-19  9:07   ` Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-19  9:37     ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170615111420.5318-6-aleksander@aleksander.es \
    --to=aleksander@aleksander.es \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox