From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] RATP logic fixes and improvements
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170619064618.jxlrucmy5fd4ikbs@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170615111420.5318-1-aleksander@aleksander.es>
Hi Aleksander,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:14:04PM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Hey Sascha,
>
> I went through the RFC916 and ended up preparing a set of fixes and improvements for the RATP logic in barebox.
> Let me know what you think.
As far as I can say the patches look good. It's quite a while since I
last looked at the RATP code, so I can't really judge. To which extent
are the patches tested? Have you explicitly tested for the corner cases
you fix in each patch? You probably have tested against your new
library. Have you also tested against the python implementation?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 11:14 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 01/16] ratp: add missing transition to SYN-RECEIVED in behavior B Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 02/16] ratp: avoid unnecessary variable initializations Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 03/16] ratp: send missing RST in behavior C2 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 04/16] ratp: add missing RST flag in behavior G Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 05/16] ratp: completely ignore RST flagged packets " Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 06/16] ratp: fix data presence check Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 07/16] ratp: fix single byte sending flagged with SO Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 08/16] ratp: remove bogus data checks in behavior C2 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 09/16] ratp: remove FIXME comment: FIN always requires ACK Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 10/16] ratp: fix sending ACKs without data Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 11/16] ratp: consolidate ratp_sn_expected() and ratp_an_expected() Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 12/16] ratp: prefer using ratp_send_ack() in behaviour I1 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 13/16] ratp: send initial data in behaviour B if any pending Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 14/16] ratp: don't ignore data that may arrive in behaviour H1 Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 15/16] ratp: consolidate setting the next AN or SN flags Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 16/16] ratp: user close may happen in SYN-RECEIVED state Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-19 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2017-06-19 9:07 ` [PATCH 00/16] RATP logic fixes and improvements Aleksander Morgado
2017-06-19 9:37 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170619064618.jxlrucmy5fd4ikbs@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=aleksander@aleksander.es \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox