From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Jan Luebbe <jlu@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: armada-xp: configure PLL and PHY register
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:17:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816081741.bcoctdw4dtai3tb4@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170815094737.27407-1-jlu@pengutronix.de>
Hallo Jan,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Jan Luebbe wrote:
> The PLL setup is needed to use the USB ports in Linux.
>
> This code is ported from mainline U-Boot arch/arm/mach-mvebu/cpu.c.
Actually this is a work around because Linux doesn't do the necessary
setup before making use of the hardware, right?
If so, wouldn't it be better to teach Linux about the needed setup?
> +static void setup_usb_phys(void)
> +{
> + int dev;
> +
> + /*
> + * USB PLL init
> + */
> +
> + /* Setup PLL frequency */
> + /* USB REF frequency = 25 MHz */
> + clrsetbits_le32(MV_USB_PHY_PLL_REG(1), 0x3ff, 0x605);
> +
> + /* Power up PLL and PHY channel */
> + setbits_le32(MV_USB_PHY_PLL_REG(2), BIT(9));
> +
> + /* Assert VCOCAL_START */
> + setbits_le32(MV_USB_PHY_PLL_REG(1), BIT(21));
> +
> + mdelay(1);
> +
> + /*
> + * USB PHY init (change from defaults) specific for 40nm (78X30 78X60)
I assume this comment also comes from U-Boot. Still I wonder if it makes
sense to use the more common names instead of "78X30 78X60". That would
be "Armada XP" but not "Armada 370", wouldn't it? (Armada 370 = 88F6710,
88F6707, and 88F6W11). If so, this code shouldn't be reached on Armada
370?
Some other places in barebox suggest, that MV78xx0 is neither XP nor 370
(e.g.
dts/Bindings/net/marvell-orion-mdio.txt
dts/Bindings/arm/marvell/mvebu-system-controller.txt
drivers/bus/Kconfig
drivers/spi/mvebu_spi.c
)
> + */
> +
> + for (dev = 0; dev < 3; dev++) {
> + setbits_le32(MV_USB_X3_PHY_CHANNEL(dev, 3), BIT(15));
> +
> + /* Assert REG_RCAL_START in channel REG 1 */
> + setbits_le32(MV_USB_X3_PHY_CHANNEL(dev, 1), BIT(12));
> + udelay(40);
> + clrbits_le32(MV_USB_X3_PHY_CHANNEL(dev, 1), BIT(12));
> + }
Can this be made quicker using:
for (dev = 0; dev < 3; dev++) {
setbits_le32(MV_USB_X3_PHY_CHANNEL(dev, 3), BIT(15));
/* Assert REG_RCAL_START in channel REG 1 */
setbits_le32(MV_USB_X3_PHY_CHANNEL(dev, 1), BIT(12));
}
udelay(40;
for (dev = 0; dev < 3; dev++)
clrbits_le32(MV_USB_X3_PHY_CHANNEL(dev, 1), BIT(12));
?
> +}
> +
> static int armada_370_xp_init_soc(void)
> {
> u32 reg;
> @@ -109,6 +151,9 @@ static int armada_370_xp_init_soc(void)
> reg = readl(ARMADA_XP_PUP_ENABLE);
> reg |= GE0_PUP_EN | GE1_PUP_EN | LCD_PUP_EN | NAND_PUP_EN | SPI_PUP_EN;
> writel(reg, ARMADA_XP_PUP_ENABLE);
> +
> + /* Configure USB PLL and PHYs on AXP */
> + setup_usb_phys();
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/armada-370-xp-regs.h b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/armada-370-xp-regs.h
> index 1dad05317211..b972df151a74 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/armada-370-xp-regs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/armada-370-xp-regs.h
> @@ -72,4 +72,6 @@
> (((port) % 4) * ARMADA_370_XP_PCIE_PORT_OFFSET))
> #define PCIE_DEVICE_VENDOR_ID 0x000
>
> +#define ARMADA_370_XP_USB_BASE (ARMADA_370_XP_INT_REGS_BASE + 0x50000)
Instead of hardcoding this address, this could be done depending on the
device at the same address specified in the device tree.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 9:47 Jan Luebbe
2017-08-16 8:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2017-08-16 10:51 ` Jan Lübbe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170816081741.bcoctdw4dtai3tb4@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox