From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand_mxs: fix NAND error when change clk rate
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821162608.ie5qyqo7hk3e4ow3@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109102133.2hwmwjqeikbbh5ck@pengutronix.de>
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:38:41PM +0100, Christian Hemp wrote:
> > The function "nand_enable_edo_mode" changed the NAND clk rate, without turning
> > it off. In this case it is posible to get the following errors:
> > MXS NAND: Error sending command
> > MXS NAND: Error sending command
> > MXS NAND: DMA read error
> >
> > This can be fixed if the NAND clk is disabled before we change the clk
> > rate.
BTW, this is even documented in the reference manual---a bit at least:
The description for CCM_CS2CDR has for example:
20-18 enfc_clk_pred
Divider for enfc clock pred divider.
NOTE: Divider should be updated when output clock is gated.
I patched the imx clk driver to not allow changes to any clock that
have this note. The nand_mxs driver then changes enfc_clk_podf which
doesn't have this note and still hangs occasionally.
> > Tested with:
> > nand: NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron
> > MT29F4G08ABADAWP), 512MiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp <c.hemp@phytec.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> > index cba0bee..ce79bca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> > @@ -2047,7 +2047,9 @@ static int mxs_nand_enable_edo_mode(struct mxs_nand_info *info)
> > nand->select_chip(mtd, -1);
> >
> > /* [3] set the main IO clock, 100MHz for mode 5, 80MHz for mode 4. */
> > + clk_disable(info->clk);
> > clk_set_rate(info->clk, (mode == 5) ? 100000000 : 80000000);
> > + clk_enable(info->clk);
>
> Calling clk_disable doesn't guarantee that the clock is actually
> disabled. If there's another user of the same clock then clk_disable
> will only decrease the usage counter.
> I think if possible we should fix this in the clock driver instead.
I agree, this is something the clock driver should be aware of. Still
more as not only the nand clk is affected.
I wonder how this should be done though. This would imply that a clk can
somehow determine its children. And this is not static as for example
clko could be a child of enfc_clk_pred. And I think we need to recurse
because if a direct child is a mux that cannot be disabled and so the
gates below the mux must be disabled instead. Alternatively we must
provide a list L of clks to such a clk A such that if A is changed the
clks in L can be disabled first (maybe after a check that the affected
clk is really an descendant of A).
And we'd need a function different to clk_disable that hard disables the
clk independent of its enable count. (Or the change function of A knows
about the interna of all clocks in L and can just disable them.) In
Linux this might be possible with clk notifiers, but I don't know for
sure.
I didn't find an idea yet that makes this all look less evil, so
comments are welcome.
@Fabio, in a different end of this thread you wrote that you want to fix
this for Linux. Did you already address this?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-21 21:38 Christian Hemp
2016-12-21 22:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-12-22 8:50 ` Christian Hemp
2016-12-22 17:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-12-23 10:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-12-27 17:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2017-01-09 10:21 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-08-21 16:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2017-08-21 16:31 ` Fabio Estevam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170821162608.ie5qyqo7hk3e4ow3@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox