mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand_mxs: fix NAND error when change clk rate
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:26:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821162608.ie5qyqo7hk3e4ow3@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109102133.2hwmwjqeikbbh5ck@pengutronix.de>

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:38:41PM +0100, Christian Hemp wrote:
> > The function "nand_enable_edo_mode" changed the NAND clk rate, without turning
> > it off. In this case it is posible to get the following errors:
> >     MXS NAND: Error sending command
> >     MXS NAND: Error sending command
> >     MXS NAND: DMA read error
> > 
> > This can be fixed if the NAND clk is disabled before we change the clk
> > rate.

BTW, this is even documented in the reference manual---a bit at least:
The description for CCM_CS2CDR has for example:

	20-18 enfc_clk_pred
	  Divider for enfc clock pred divider.
	  NOTE: Divider should be updated when output clock is gated.

I patched the imx clk driver to not allow changes to any clock that
have this note. The nand_mxs driver then changes enfc_clk_podf which
doesn't have this note and still hangs occasionally.

> > Tested with:
> > nand: NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron
> > MT29F4G08ABADAWP), 512MiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp <c.hemp@phytec.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> > index cba0bee..ce79bca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> > @@ -2047,7 +2047,9 @@ static int mxs_nand_enable_edo_mode(struct mxs_nand_info *info)
> >  	nand->select_chip(mtd, -1);
> >  
> >  	/* [3] set the main IO clock, 100MHz for mode 5, 80MHz for mode 4. */
> > +	clk_disable(info->clk);
> >  	clk_set_rate(info->clk, (mode == 5) ? 100000000 : 80000000);
> > +	clk_enable(info->clk);
> 
> Calling clk_disable doesn't guarantee that the clock is actually
> disabled. If there's another user of the same clock then clk_disable
> will only decrease the usage counter.
> I think if possible we should fix this in the clock driver instead.

I agree, this is something the clock driver should be aware of. Still
more as not only the nand clk is affected.

I wonder how this should be done though. This would imply that a clk can
somehow determine its children. And this is not static as for example
clko could be a child of enfc_clk_pred. And I think we need to recurse
because if a direct child is a mux that cannot be disabled and so the
gates below the mux must be disabled instead.  Alternatively we must
provide a list L of clks to such a clk A such that if A is changed the
clks in L can be disabled first (maybe after a check that the affected
clk is really an descendant of A).

And we'd need a function different to clk_disable that hard disables the
clk independent of its enable count. (Or the change function of A knows
about the interna of all clocks in L and can just disable them.) In
Linux this might be possible with clk notifiers, but I don't know for
sure.

I didn't find an idea yet that makes this all look less evil, so
comments are welcome.

@Fabio, in a different end of this thread you wrote that you want to fix
this for Linux. Did you already address this?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-21 21:38 Christian Hemp
2016-12-21 22:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-12-22  8:50   ` Christian Hemp
2016-12-22 17:55     ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-12-23 10:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-12-27 17:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2017-01-09 10:21 ` Sascha Hauer
2017-08-21 16:26   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2017-08-21 16:31     ` Fabio Estevam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170821162608.ie5qyqo7hk3e4ow3@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox