From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from asavdk3.altibox.net ([109.247.116.14]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1edcL2-0001mj-NK for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:40:43 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:40:20 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg Message-ID: <20180122134020.GA22403@ravnborg.org> References: <20180122100131.11820-1-antonynpavlov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180122100131.11820-1-antonynpavlov@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sandbox: use 'poweroff' command for exit To: Antony Pavlov Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Antony On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:01:31PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > The 'poweroff' command is more appropriate for exit > barebox than 'reset'. Changelog says "reset" but code says "restart". Could the restart command be useful for others than sandbox? In other words, is it correct to delete this command? Sam > arch/sandbox/board/restart.c | 17 ----------------- _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox