From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1edcYH-00086L-6t for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:54:23 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id t79so10677382lfe.3 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:54:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:08:31 +0300 From: Antony Pavlov Message-Id: <20180122170831.684ce2c7b0d5421311d41528@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180122134020.GA22403@ravnborg.org> References: <20180122100131.11820-1-antonynpavlov@gmail.com> <20180122134020.GA22403@ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sandbox: use 'poweroff' command for exit To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:40:20 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Antony > = > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:01:31PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > The 'poweroff' command is more appropriate for exit > > barebox than 'reset'. > = > Changelog says "reset" but code says "restart". The command name is 'reset'. No matter what is the file's name. I can't see 'restart' command in barebox mainline master branch. > Could the restart command be useful for others than sandbox? > In other words, is it correct to delete this command? I see no reason for dropping 'reset' command. Sometimes 'reset' and 'poweroff' commands are very handy. > = > Sam > = > > arch/sandbox/board/restart.c | 17 ----------------- -- = Best regards, =A0 Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox