From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] net/e1000: use correct bit to check for flash presence
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 12:32:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180124113216.16950-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de> (raw)
This code path was checking the same bit (E1000_EECD_EE_PRES) twice,
which doesn't look right. Use the correct bit to check for flash
presence.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 1 -
drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
index 1558b3c7f5c7..0c83a47e9aab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
@@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ struct e1000_eeprom_info {
#ifndef E1000_EEPROM_GRANT_ATTEMPTS
#define E1000_EEPROM_GRANT_ATTEMPTS 1000 /* EEPROM # attempts to gain grant */
#endif
-#define E1000_EECD_FLASH_IN_USE 0x00000100 /* Flash is present with a valid signature */
#define E1000_EECD_EE_PRES 0x00000100
#define E1000_EECD_AUTO_RD 0x00000200 /* EEPROM Auto Read done */
#define E1000_EECD_SIZE_EX_MASK 0x00007800 /* EEprom Size */
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
index 748d8afe7922..ee4f768bb4cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ int e1000_register_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw)
if (eecd & E1000_EECD_AUTO_RD) {
if (eecd & E1000_EECD_EE_PRES) {
- if (eecd & E1000_EECD_FLASH_IN_USE) {
+ if (eecd & E1000_EECD_I210_FLASH_DETECTED) {
uint32_t fla = e1000_read_reg(hw, E1000_FLA);
dev_info(hw->dev,
"Hardware programmed from flash (%ssecure)\n",
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 11:32 Lucas Stach [this message]
2018-01-24 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/e1000: mark EEPROM as invalid if external flash is absent Lucas Stach
2018-01-24 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] net/e1000: don't check EEPROM signature if populated from iNVM Lucas Stach
2018-01-25 7:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] net/e1000: use correct bit to check for flash presence Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180124113216.16950-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox