mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] net/e1000: EEPROM isn't valid if only iNVM is available
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:32:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180126133232.4992-3-l.stach@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180126133232.4992-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de>

There is no point in registering the emulated EEPROM device if only the
iNVM is available with no external flash attached to the i210, as in
practice it's only shadowing the iNVM.

When the EEPROM is populated from iNVM, the signature is not valid, which
causes other parts of the driver to fall over. To fix this just ignore
the EEPROM in that case.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
index ddac7de8a0e9..0a28dfdd8868 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
@@ -1525,20 +1525,18 @@ int e1000_register_invm(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 
 int e1000_eeprom_valid(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 {
-	uint32_t eecd;
+	uint32_t valid_mask = E1000_EECD_FLASH_IN_USE |
+			      E1000_EECD_AUTO_RD | E1000_EECD_EE_PRES;
 
 	if (hw->mac_type != e1000_igb)
 		return 1;
 
 	/*
-	 * if AUTO_RD or EE_PRES are not set in EECD, the shadow RAM is invalid
-	 * (and in practise seems to contain the contents of iNVM).
+	 * If there is no flash in use or AUTO_RD or EE_PRES are not set in
+	 * EECD, the shadow RAM is invalid (and in practise seems to contain
+	 * the contents of iNVM).
 	 */
-	eecd = e1000_read_reg(hw, E1000_EECD);
-	if (!(eecd & E1000_EECD_AUTO_RD))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (!(eecd & E1000_EECD_EE_PRES))
+	if ((e1000_read_reg(hw, E1000_EECD) & valid_mask) != valid_mask)
 		return 0;
 
 	return 1;
-- 
2.15.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-26 13:32 [PATCH v3 1/5] net/e1000: remove one level of indentation Lucas Stach
2018-01-26 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] net/e1000: use correct bit for flash detection Lucas Stach
2018-01-26 13:32 ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2018-01-26 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] net/e1000: don't check EEPROM signature if populated from iNVM Lucas Stach
2018-01-26 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] net/e1000: don't register EERPOM device if the content is invalid Lucas Stach
2018-01-30  6:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] net/e1000: remove one level of indentation Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180126133232.4992-3-l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox