mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: nand_omap_gpmc: Fix ecc steps
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 07:50:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524055002.hnlrned57qm5xuom@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527081068-23929-1-git-send-email-t.remmet@phytec.de>

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:11:08PM +0200, Teresa Remmet wrote:
> The eccsteps where set wrong for OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_ROMCODE.
> So the ECC was only corrected for the first 512 bytes chunk of a 2k page.
> 
> Moved out the ecc step iteration out of the correcting loop to make
> it more alike the generic nand functions. And made sure that
> the ECC is caclulated for all chunks.
> 
> This patch is based on work of Sascha Hauer.
> 
> Fixes commit dec7b4d2bf9c ("mtd: nand_omap_gpmc: fix BCH error correction").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

Applied, thanks.

I modified the patch a bit, see the next branch.

Sascha

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - removed unnecessary check of eccflag
> - return funtion early when no error came up
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> index e18ce6358a73..9c9519156dcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> @@ -297,19 +297,18 @@ static int omap_correct_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>  {
>  	struct nand_chip *nand = (struct nand_chip *)(mtd->priv);
>  	struct gpmc_nand_info *oinfo = (struct gpmc_nand_info *)(nand->priv);
> -	int i, j, eccflag, totalcount, actual_eccsize;
> +	int j, actual_eccsize;
>  	const uint8_t *erased_ecc_vec;
>  	unsigned int err_loc[8];
> -	int bitflip_count;
>  	int bch_max_err;
> +	int bitflip_count = 0;
> +	bool eccflag = 0;
> +	bool is_error_reported = false;
>  
> -	int eccsteps = (nand->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) &&
> -			(nand->ecc.size == 2048) ? 4 : 1;
>  	int eccsize = oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes;
>  
>  	switch (oinfo->ecc_mode) {
>  	case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW:
> -		eccsize /= eccsteps;
>  		actual_eccsize = eccsize;
>  		erased_ecc_vec = bch8_vector;
>  		bch_max_err = BCH8_MAX_ERROR;
> @@ -324,58 +323,48 @@ static int omap_correct_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	totalcount = 0;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < eccsteps; i++) {
> -		bool is_error_reported = false;
> -		bitflip_count = 0;
> -		eccflag = 0;
> -
> -		/* check for any ecc error */
> -		for (j = 0; (j < actual_eccsize) && (eccflag == 0); j++) {
> -			if (calc_ecc[j] != 0) {
> -				eccflag = 1;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
> -
> -		if (eccflag == 1) {
> -			if (memcmp(calc_ecc, erased_ecc_vec, actual_eccsize) == 0) {
> -				/*
> -				 * calc_ecc[] matches pattern for ECC
> -				 * (all 0xff) so this is definitely
> -				 * an erased-page
> -				 */
> -			} else {
> -				bitflip_count = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(
> -						dat, oinfo->nand.ecc.size, read_ecc,
> -						eccsize, NULL, 0, bch_max_err);
> -				if (bitflip_count < 0)
> -					is_error_reported = true;
> -			}
> +	/* check for any ecc error */
> +	for (j = 0; j < actual_eccsize; j++) {
> +		if (calc_ecc[j] != 0) {
> +			eccflag = 1;
> +			break;
>  		}
> +	}
>  
> -		if (is_error_reported) {
> -			bitflip_count = omap_gpmc_decode_bch(1,
> -					calc_ecc, err_loc);
> +	if (eccflag == 1) {
> +		if (memcmp(calc_ecc, erased_ecc_vec, actual_eccsize) == 0) {
> +			/*
> +			 * calc_ecc[] matches pattern for ECC
> +			 * (all 0xff) so this is definitely
> +			 * an erased-page
> +			 */
> +			return 0;
> +		} else {
> +			bitflip_count = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(
> +					dat, oinfo->nand.ecc.size, read_ecc,
> +					eccsize, NULL, 0, bch_max_err);
>  			if (bitflip_count < 0)
> -				return bitflip_count;
> -
> -			for (j = 0; j < bitflip_count; j++) {
> -				if (err_loc[j] < 4096)
> -					dat[err_loc[j] >> 3] ^=
> -						1 << (err_loc[j] & 7);
> -				/* else, not interested to correct ecc */
> -			}
> +				is_error_reported = true;
>  		}
> +	} else {
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
> -		totalcount += bitflip_count;
> -		calc_ecc = calc_ecc + actual_eccsize;
> -		read_ecc = read_ecc + eccsize;
> -		dat += 512;
> +	if (is_error_reported) {
> +		bitflip_count = omap_gpmc_decode_bch(1,
> +				calc_ecc, err_loc);
> +		if (bitflip_count < 0)
> +			return bitflip_count;
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < bitflip_count; j++) {
> +			if (err_loc[j] < 4096)
> +				dat[err_loc[j] >> 3] ^=
> +					1 << (err_loc[j] & 7);
> +			/* else, not interested to correct ecc */
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> -	return totalcount;
> +	return bitflip_count;
>  }
>  
>  static int omap_correct_hamming(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
> @@ -666,7 +655,12 @@ static int omap_gpmc_read_page_bch_rom_mode(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  	uint8_t *ecc_calc = chip->buffers->ecccalc;
>  	uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->buffers->ecccode;
>  	uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
> -	int stat, i;
> +	int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
> +	int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
> +	int eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
> +	unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> +	int stat, i, j;
> +
>  
>  	writel(GPMC_ECC_SIZE_CONFIG_ECCSIZE1(0) |
>  			GPMC_ECC_SIZE_CONFIG_ECCSIZE0(64),
> @@ -706,13 +700,19 @@ static int omap_gpmc_read_page_bch_rom_mode(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  
>  	__omap_calculate_ecc(mtd, buf, ecc_calc, 1);
>  
> -	stat = omap_correct_bch(mtd, buf, ecc_code, ecc_calc);
> -	if (stat < 0)
> -		mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> -	else
> -		mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> +	p = buf;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	for (i = 0, j = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize, j++) {
> +		stat = omap_correct_bch(mtd, p, &ecc_code[i], &ecc_calc[i - j]);
> +		if (stat < 0) {
> +			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +		} else {
> +			mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> +			max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return max_bitflips;
>  }
>  
>  static int omap_gpmc_eccmode(struct gpmc_nand_info *oinfo,
> @@ -765,8 +765,8 @@ static int omap_gpmc_eccmode(struct gpmc_nand_info *oinfo,
>  					offset - omap_oobinfo.eccbytes;
>  		break;
>  	case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW:
> -		oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes    = 13 * 4;
> -		oinfo->nand.ecc.size     = 512 * 4;
> +		oinfo->nand.ecc.bytes    = 13;
> +		oinfo->nand.ecc.size     = 512;
>  		oinfo->nand.ecc.strength = BCH8_MAX_ERROR;
>  		omap_oobinfo.oobfree->offset = offset;
>  		omap_oobinfo.oobfree->length = minfo->oobsize -
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

      reply	other threads:[~2018-05-24  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23 13:11 Teresa Remmet
2018-05-24  5:50 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180524055002.hnlrned57qm5xuom@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=t.remmet@phytec.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox