From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fRBT7-000431-7y for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:06:01 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 09:05:40 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20180608070540.m6etfu37vu6s64ic@pengutronix.de> References: <20180607174011.13130-1-pvizeli@syshack.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180607174011.13130-1-pvizeli@syshack.ch> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers: of: bugfix partition fixups To: Pascal Vizeli Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 05:40:11PM +0000, Pascal Vizeli wrote: > If we load a new device tree for linux kernel with a diferent layout, > the fixup of partition going into endless loop. Exactly the of_find_property > function will never come back on a invalid device_node. of_find_property is not called directly from the code you are changing, so how excatly is the code path that fails? > > My patch check, if the device will exists on device tree before we run the > fixup. > > Signed-off-by: Pascal Vizeli > --- > drivers/of/partition.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/partition.c b/drivers/of/partition.c > index aa6e601b7..17e420964 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/partition.c > +++ b/drivers/of/partition.c > @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ static int of_partition_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *ctx) > if (!cdev->device_node) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (!of_find_node_by_path(cdev->device_node->full_name)) > + return -EINVAL; > + What are you doing to get into this situation? This test should never fail or else we are in trouble. Is there some "oftree -f" command involved? I should really remove this command since in a device tree based system there are always references to device nodes which are not expected to become invalid. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox