From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: lib64: Properly handle unaligned addresses in string functions
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:41:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180813064144.7ocirutuvzltrrmn@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180810185201.7677-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> Together FEC driver and parts of IP stack might end up trying to
> memcpy() small chunks of memory from uncached (that is Device memory)
> addresses that are not properly aligned, leading to data abort.
>
> To prevent such cases, add code to guard unaligned accesses and
> redirect them to byte-wise implementations which do not have the above
> problem.
Please no. IMO this problem only shows that the FEC driver shouldn't use
dma_alloc_coherent() to allocate its receive buffers, but instead should
use dma_alloc + dma_sync_*.
Sascha
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/lib64/string.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib64/string.c b/arch/arm/lib64/string.c
> index cb2633152..1b04f4487 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib64/string.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib64/string.c
> @@ -5,9 +5,16 @@
> void *__arch_memset(void *dst, int c, __kernel_size_t size);
> void *__arch_memcpy(void * dest, const void *src, size_t count);
>
> +static bool properly_aligned(const void *ptr)
> +{
> + const unsigned long address = (unsigned long)ptr;
> +
> + return get_cr() & CR_M && IS_ALIGNED(address, 16);
> +}
> +
> void *memset(void *dst, int c, __kernel_size_t size)
> {
> - if (likely(get_cr() & CR_M))
> + if (likely(properly_aligned(dst)))
> return __arch_memset(dst, c, size);
>
> return __default_memset(dst, c, size);
> @@ -15,7 +22,7 @@ void *memset(void *dst, int c, __kernel_size_t size)
>
> void *memcpy(void * dest, const void *src, size_t count)
> {
> - if (likely(get_cr() & CR_M))
> + if (likely(properly_aligned(dest) && properly_aligned(src)))
> return __arch_memcpy(dest, src, count);
>
> return __default_memcpy(dest, src, count);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-13 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 18:52 Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-13 6:41 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2018-08-13 14:16 ` Andrey Smirnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180813064144.7ocirutuvzltrrmn@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox