From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: clk-sccg-pll: Drop prepare/unprepare for SCCG_PLL2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:28:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821062853.18301-2-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821062853.18301-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
A number of PLL pairs (e.g. "sys1_pll1" and "sys1_pll2") share the
same configuration register, so touching PD bit, as is done for
SCCG_PLL2 in its prepare/unprepare methods will result in shut down of
both PLLs. This is very undesireable, since attempting to re-parent a
clock to "sys1_pll2" might result in complete system shutdown due to
"sys1_pll1" being shut-down as a part of re-parenting process.
There might be a better solution, but for now, just drop both methods
for SCCG_PLL2, since this seem to work OK in practice.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c | 25 -------------------------
1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c
index bbfd95a11..cd1079b0c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c
@@ -103,29 +103,6 @@ static int clk_pll1_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate,
return 0;
}
-static int clk_pll1_prepare(struct clk *clk)
-{
- struct clk_sccg_pll *pll = to_clk_sccg_pll(clk);
- u32 val;
-
- val = readl(pll->base);
- val &= ~(1 << PLL_PD);
- writel(val, pll->base);
-
- /* FIXME: PLL lock check */
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void clk_pll1_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
-{
- struct clk_sccg_pll *pll = to_clk_sccg_pll(clk);
- u32 val;
- val = readl(pll->base);
- val |= (1 << PLL_PD);
- writel(val, pll->base);
-}
-
static unsigned long clk_pll2_recalc_rate(struct clk *clk,
unsigned long parent_rate)
{
@@ -198,8 +175,6 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_sccg_pll1_ops = {
};
static const struct clk_ops clk_sccg_pll2_ops = {
- .enable = clk_pll1_prepare,
- .disable = clk_pll1_unprepare,
.recalc_rate = clk_pll2_recalc_rate,
.round_rate = clk_pll2_round_rate,
.set_rate = clk_pll2_set_rate,
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-21 6:28 [PATCH 1/2] clk: clk-sccg-pll: Remove leftover debug output Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-21 6:28 ` Andrey Smirnov [this message]
2018-08-22 7:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: clk-sccg-pll: Drop prepare/unprepare for SCCG_PLL2 Sascha Hauer
2018-08-23 1:07 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-23 6:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-08-28 19:25 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-22 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: clk-sccg-pll: Remove leftover debug output Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821062853.18301-2-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--to=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox