* [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-21 15:19 RATP i2c and GPIO support Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-21 15:19 ` Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 19:38 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-22 7:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-08-21 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] bbremote: " Aleksander Morgado
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Aleksander Morgado @ 2018-08-21 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox, s.hauer; +Cc: Aleksander Morgado
Introduce two new RATP commands that allow running i2c read/write
operations, very similar in format to the already existing md/mw
RATP commands.
The messages are defined with a fixed 16-bit long register field, but
it will only be treated as a 16-bit address if I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS
is set in the message flags field. If this flag is unset, the start
register address is assumed 8-bit long.
If the message includes the I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE flag, the start
register field is ignored and a i2c master send/receive operation is
performed.
Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
---
common/ratp/Makefile | 1 +
common/ratp/i2c.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/ratp_bb.h | 4 +
3 files changed, 286 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 common/ratp/i2c.c
diff --git a/common/ratp/Makefile b/common/ratp/Makefile
index 2c6d674f6..0234b55c1 100644
--- a/common/ratp/Makefile
+++ b/common/ratp/Makefile
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-y += getenv.o
obj-y += md.o
obj-y += mw.o
obj-y += reset.o
+obj-y += i2c.o
diff --git a/common/ratp/i2c.c b/common/ratp/i2c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b8d055b67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/common/ratp/i2c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2011-2018 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix
+ *
+ * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
+ * project.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <ratp_bb.h>
+#include <init.h>
+#include <driver.h>
+#include <malloc.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <i2c/i2c.h>
+
+/* NOTE:
+ * - Fixed-size fields (e.g. integers) are given just after the header.
+ * - Variable-length fields are stored inside the buffer[] and their position
+ * within the buffer[] and their size are given as fixed-sized fields after
+ * the header.
+ * The message may be extended at any time keeping backwards compatibility,
+ * as the position of the buffer[] is given by the buffer_offset field. i.e.
+ * increasing the buffer_offset field we can extend the fixed-sized section
+ * to add more fields.
+ */
+
+#define I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS (1 << 0)
+#define I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE (1 << 1)
+
+struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint16_t buffer_offset;
+ uint8_t bus;
+ uint8_t addr;
+ uint16_t reg;
+ uint8_t flags;
+ uint16_t size;
+ uint8_t buffer[];
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_response {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint16_t buffer_offset;
+ uint32_t errno;
+ uint16_t data_size;
+ uint16_t data_offset;
+ uint8_t buffer[];
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_request {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint16_t buffer_offset;
+ uint8_t bus;
+ uint8_t addr;
+ uint16_t reg;
+ uint8_t flags;
+ uint16_t data_size;
+ uint16_t data_offset;
+ uint8_t buffer[];
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_response {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint16_t buffer_offset;
+ uint32_t errno;
+ uint16_t written;
+ uint8_t buffer[];
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+static int ratp_cmd_i2c_read(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
+ struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
+{
+ struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request *i2c_read_req = (struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request *)req;
+ struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_response *i2c_read_rsp;
+ struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
+ struct i2c_client client;
+ uint16_t buffer_offset;
+ int i2c_read_rsp_len;
+ uint16_t reg;
+ uint16_t size;
+ uint32_t wide = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* At least message header should be valid */
+ if (req_len < sizeof(*i2c_read_req)) {
+ printf("ratp i2c read ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n",
+ req_len, sizeof (*i2c_read_req));
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_rsp;
+ }
+
+ /* We don't require any buffer here, but just validate buffer position and size */
+ buffer_offset = be16_to_cpu(i2c_read_req->buffer_offset);
+ if (buffer_offset != req_len) {
+ printf("ratp i2c read ignored: invalid buffer offset (%hu != %d)\n",
+ buffer_offset, req_len);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_rsp;
+ }
+
+ reg = be16_to_cpu (i2c_read_req->reg);
+ size = be16_to_cpu (i2c_read_req->size);
+ if (i2c_read_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS)
+ wide = I2C_ADDR_16_BIT;
+
+out_rsp:
+ /* Avoid reading anything on error */
+ if (ret != 0)
+ size = 0;
+
+ i2c_read_rsp_len = sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp) + size;
+ i2c_read_rsp = xzalloc(i2c_read_rsp_len);
+ i2c_read_rsp->header.type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ_RETURN);
+ i2c_read_rsp->buffer_offset = cpu_to_be16(sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp));
+ i2c_read_rsp->data_offset = 0;
+
+ /* Don't read anything on error or if 0 bytes were requested */
+ if (size > 0) {
+ adapter = i2c_get_adapter(i2c_read_req->bus);
+ if (!adapter) {
+ printf("ratp i2c read ignored: i2c bus %u not found\n", i2c_read_req->bus);
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ client.adapter = adapter;
+ client.addr = i2c_read_req->addr;
+
+ if (i2c_read_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE) {
+ ret = i2c_master_recv(&client, i2c_read_rsp->buffer, size);
+ } else {
+ ret = i2c_read_reg(&client, reg | wide, i2c_read_rsp->buffer, size);
+ }
+ if (ret != size) {
+ printf("ratp i2c read ignored: not all bytes read (%u < %u)\n", ret, size);
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+
+out:
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ i2c_read_rsp->data_size = 0;
+ i2c_read_rsp->errno = cpu_to_be32(ret);
+ i2c_read_rsp_len = sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp);
+ } else {
+ i2c_read_rsp->data_size = cpu_to_be16(size);
+ i2c_read_rsp->errno = 0;
+ }
+
+ *rsp = (struct ratp_bb *)i2c_read_rsp;
+ *rsp_len = i2c_read_rsp_len;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(I2C_READ)
+ .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ,
+ .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ_RETURN,
+ .cmd = ratp_cmd_i2c_read
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
+
+
+static int ratp_cmd_i2c_write(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
+ struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
+{
+ struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_request *i2c_write_req = (struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_request *)req;
+ struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_response *i2c_write_rsp;
+ struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
+ struct i2c_client client;
+ uint8_t *buffer;
+ uint16_t buffer_offset;
+ uint16_t buffer_size;
+ uint16_t reg;
+ uint16_t data_offset;
+ uint16_t data_size;
+ uint32_t wide = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+ int written = 0;
+
+ /* At least message header should be valid */
+ if (req_len < sizeof(*i2c_write_req)) {
+ printf("ratp i2c write ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n",
+ req_len, sizeof (*i2c_write_req));
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Validate buffer position and size */
+ buffer_offset = be16_to_cpu(i2c_write_req->buffer_offset);
+ if (req_len < buffer_offset) {
+ printf("ratp i2c write ignored: invalid buffer offset (%d < %hu)\n",
+ req_len, buffer_offset);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ buffer_size = req_len - buffer_offset;
+ buffer = ((uint8_t *)i2c_write_req) + buffer_offset;
+
+ /* Validate data position and size */
+ data_offset = be16_to_cpu(i2c_write_req->data_offset);
+ if (data_offset != 0) {
+ printf("ratp i2c write ignored: invalid data offset\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ data_size = be16_to_cpu(i2c_write_req->data_size);
+ if (!data_size) {
+ /* Success */
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Validate buffer size */
+ if (buffer_size < data_size) {
+ printf("ratp i2c write ignored: size mismatch (%d < %hu): data not fully given\n",
+ buffer_size, data_size);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ reg = be16_to_cpu (i2c_write_req->reg);
+ if (i2c_write_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS)
+ wide = I2C_ADDR_16_BIT;
+
+ adapter = i2c_get_adapter(i2c_write_req->bus);
+ if (!adapter) {
+ printf("ratp i2c write ignored: i2c bus %u not found\n", i2c_write_req->bus);
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ client.adapter = adapter;
+ client.addr = i2c_write_req->addr;
+
+ if (i2c_write_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE) {
+ written = i2c_master_send(&client, &buffer[data_offset], data_size);
+ } else {
+ written = i2c_write_reg(&client, reg | wide, &buffer[data_offset], data_size);
+ }
+
+ if (written != data_size) {
+ printf("ratp i2c write ignored: not all bytes written (%u < %u)\n", ret, data_size);
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out:
+ i2c_write_rsp = xzalloc(sizeof(*i2c_write_rsp));
+ i2c_write_rsp->header.type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE_RETURN);
+ i2c_write_rsp->buffer_offset = cpu_to_be16(sizeof(*i2c_write_rsp)); /* n/a */
+
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ i2c_write_rsp->written = 0;
+ i2c_write_rsp->errno = cpu_to_be32(ret);
+ } else {
+ i2c_write_rsp->written = cpu_to_be16((uint16_t)written);
+ i2c_write_rsp->errno = 0;
+ }
+
+ *rsp = (struct ratp_bb *)i2c_write_rsp;
+ *rsp_len = sizeof(*i2c_write_rsp);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(I2C_WRITE)
+ .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE,
+ .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE_RETURN,
+ .cmd = ratp_cmd_i2c_write
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
diff --git a/include/ratp_bb.h b/include/ratp_bb.h
index 3a80cf6ae..32b8040b6 100644
--- a/include/ratp_bb.h
+++ b/include/ratp_bb.h
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
#define BB_RATP_TYPE_MW 12
#define BB_RATP_TYPE_MW_RETURN 13
#define BB_RATP_TYPE_RESET 14
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ 15
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ_RETURN 16
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE 17
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE_RETURN 18
struct ratp_bb {
uint16_t type;
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-21 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-21 19:38 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-09-12 9:25 ` Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-22 7:46 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Smirnov @ 2018-08-21 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksander Morgado; +Cc: Barebox List
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 8:20 AM Aleksander Morgado
<aleksander@aleksander.es> wrote:
>
> Introduce two new RATP commands that allow running i2c read/write
> operations, very similar in format to the already existing md/mw
> RATP commands.
>
> The messages are defined with a fixed 16-bit long register field, but
> it will only be treated as a 16-bit address if I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS
> is set in the message flags field. If this flag is unset, the start
> register address is assumed 8-bit long.
>
> If the message includes the I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE flag, the start
> register field is ignored and a i2c master send/receive operation is
> performed.
>
LGTM, minor nitpicks below.
> Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
> ---
> common/ratp/Makefile | 1 +
> common/ratp/i2c.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/ratp_bb.h | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 286 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 common/ratp/i2c.c
>
> diff --git a/common/ratp/Makefile b/common/ratp/Makefile
> index 2c6d674f6..0234b55c1 100644
> --- a/common/ratp/Makefile
> +++ b/common/ratp/Makefile
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-y += getenv.o
> obj-y += md.o
> obj-y += mw.o
> obj-y += reset.o
> +obj-y += i2c.o
> diff --git a/common/ratp/i2c.c b/common/ratp/i2c.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..b8d055b67
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/common/ratp/i2c.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2011-2018 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix
> + *
Is the above really true?
> + * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
> + * project.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <ratp_bb.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <driver.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <i2c/i2c.h>
> +
> +/* NOTE:
> + * - Fixed-size fields (e.g. integers) are given just after the header.
> + * - Variable-length fields are stored inside the buffer[] and their position
> + * within the buffer[] and their size are given as fixed-sized fields after
> + * the header.
> + * The message may be extended at any time keeping backwards compatibility,
> + * as the position of the buffer[] is given by the buffer_offset field. i.e.
> + * increasing the buffer_offset field we can extend the fixed-sized section
> + * to add more fields.
> + */
> +
> +#define I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS (1 << 0)
> +#define I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE (1 << 1)
BIT() might be a bit more concise
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + uint8_t bus;
> + uint8_t addr;
> + uint16_t reg;
> + uint8_t flags;
> + uint16_t size;
> + uint8_t buffer[];
> +} __attribute__((packed));
There should already be __packed shortcut, so you can use it instead
of the "full form". Same for all other headers below.
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_response {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + uint32_t errno;
> + uint16_t data_size;
> + uint16_t data_offset;
> + uint8_t buffer[];
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_request {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + uint8_t bus;
> + uint8_t addr;
> + uint16_t reg;
> + uint8_t flags;
> + uint16_t data_size;
> + uint16_t data_offset;
> + uint8_t buffer[];
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_response {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + uint32_t errno;
> + uint16_t written;
> + uint8_t buffer[];
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +static int ratp_cmd_i2c_read(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
> + struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
> +{
> + struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request *i2c_read_req = (struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request *)req;
> + struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_response *i2c_read_rsp;
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> + struct i2c_client client;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + int i2c_read_rsp_len;
> + uint16_t reg;
> + uint16_t size;
> + uint32_t wide = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /* At least message header should be valid */
> + if (req_len < sizeof(*i2c_read_req)) {
> + printf("ratp i2c read ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n",
You can use pr_err() here instead. This way this error message would
have log level embedded in it and on builds/terminals that support it
it would be colored accordingly (red). You can also look into
utilizing pr_fmt() for providing common prefix for all of your pr_*
printed messages. Like, for example, is done here:
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/tree/drivers/pci/pci.c#n1
> + req_len, sizeof (*i2c_read_req));
Looks like there's a whitespace before "(" (GNU coding style?).
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_rsp;
> + }
> +
> + /* We don't require any buffer here, but just validate buffer position and size */
> + buffer_offset = be16_to_cpu(i2c_read_req->buffer_offset);
> + if (buffer_offset != req_len) {
> + printf("ratp i2c read ignored: invalid buffer offset (%hu != %d)\n",
> + buffer_offset, req_len);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_rsp;
> + }
> +
> + reg = be16_to_cpu (i2c_read_req->reg);
> + size = be16_to_cpu (i2c_read_req->size);
Looks like more of whitespace before opening parenthesis.
> + if (i2c_read_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS)
> + wide = I2C_ADDR_16_BIT;
> +
> +out_rsp:
> + /* Avoid reading anything on error */
> + if (ret != 0)
> + size = 0;
> +
> + i2c_read_rsp_len = sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp) + size;
> + i2c_read_rsp = xzalloc(i2c_read_rsp_len);
> + i2c_read_rsp->header.type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ_RETURN);
> + i2c_read_rsp->buffer_offset = cpu_to_be16(sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp));
> + i2c_read_rsp->data_offset = 0;
> +
> + /* Don't read anything on error or if 0 bytes were requested */
> + if (size > 0) {
> + adapter = i2c_get_adapter(i2c_read_req->bus);
> + if (!adapter) {
> + printf("ratp i2c read ignored: i2c bus %u not found\n", i2c_read_req->bus);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + client.adapter = adapter;
> + client.addr = i2c_read_req->addr;
> +
> + if (i2c_read_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE) {
> + ret = i2c_master_recv(&client, i2c_read_rsp->buffer, size);
> + } else {
> + ret = i2c_read_reg(&client, reg | wide, i2c_read_rsp->buffer, size);
> + }
> + if (ret != size) {
> + printf("ratp i2c read ignored: not all bytes read (%u < %u)\n", ret, size);
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + i2c_read_rsp->data_size = 0;
> + i2c_read_rsp->errno = cpu_to_be32(ret);
> + i2c_read_rsp_len = sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp);
> + } else {
> + i2c_read_rsp->data_size = cpu_to_be16(size);
> + i2c_read_rsp->errno = 0;
> + }
> +
It looks like you can move:
i2c_read_rsp->data_size = cpu_to_be16(size);
i2c_read_rsp->errno = cpu_to_be32(ret);
outside of if since it should work as intended for both cases (size is
0 if ret != 0).
> + *rsp = (struct ratp_bb *)i2c_read_rsp;
> + *rsp_len = i2c_read_rsp_len;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(I2C_READ)
> + .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ,
> + .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ_RETURN,
> + .cmd = ratp_cmd_i2c_read
> +BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
> +
> +
> +static int ratp_cmd_i2c_write(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
> + struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
> +{
> + struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_request *i2c_write_req = (struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_request *)req;
> + struct ratp_bb_i2c_write_response *i2c_write_rsp;
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> + struct i2c_client client;
> + uint8_t *buffer;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + uint16_t buffer_size;
> + uint16_t reg;
> + uint16_t data_offset;
> + uint16_t data_size;
> + uint32_t wide = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int written = 0;
> +
> + /* At least message header should be valid */
> + if (req_len < sizeof(*i2c_write_req)) {
> + printf("ratp i2c write ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n",
> + req_len, sizeof (*i2c_write_req));
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Validate buffer position and size */
> + buffer_offset = be16_to_cpu(i2c_write_req->buffer_offset);
> + if (req_len < buffer_offset) {
> + printf("ratp i2c write ignored: invalid buffer offset (%d < %hu)\n",
> + req_len, buffer_offset);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + buffer_size = req_len - buffer_offset;
> + buffer = ((uint8_t *)i2c_write_req) + buffer_offset;
> +
> + /* Validate data position and size */
> + data_offset = be16_to_cpu(i2c_write_req->data_offset);
> + if (data_offset != 0) {
> + printf("ratp i2c write ignored: invalid data offset\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + data_size = be16_to_cpu(i2c_write_req->data_size);
> + if (!data_size) {
> + /* Success */
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Validate buffer size */
> + if (buffer_size < data_size) {
> + printf("ratp i2c write ignored: size mismatch (%d < %hu): data not fully given\n",
> + buffer_size, data_size);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + reg = be16_to_cpu (i2c_write_req->reg);
> + if (i2c_write_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS)
> + wide = I2C_ADDR_16_BIT;
> +
> + adapter = i2c_get_adapter(i2c_write_req->bus);
> + if (!adapter) {
> + printf("ratp i2c write ignored: i2c bus %u not found\n", i2c_write_req->bus);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + client.adapter = adapter;
> + client.addr = i2c_write_req->addr;
This pattern seems to have quite a bit of users in the codebase
already, so if you feel like going through the motions needed, this
can probably added as a simple helper function in include/i2c/i2c.h
and drivers/i2c/i2c.c.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-21 19:38 ` Andrey Smirnov
@ 2018-09-12 9:25 ` Aleksander Morgado
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Aleksander Morgado @ 2018-09-12 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Smirnov; +Cc: Barebox List
Hey Andrey,
Thanks for the review :) see some comments below.
>> + /* Don't read anything on error or if 0 bytes were requested */
>> + if (size > 0) {
>> + adapter = i2c_get_adapter(i2c_read_req->bus);
>> + if (!adapter) {
>> + printf("ratp i2c read ignored: i2c bus %u not found\n", i2c_read_req->bus);
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + client.adapter = adapter;
>> + client.addr = i2c_read_req->addr;
>> +
>> + if (i2c_read_req->flags & I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE) {
>> + ret = i2c_master_recv(&client, i2c_read_rsp->buffer, size);
>> + } else {
>> + ret = i2c_read_reg(&client, reg | wide, i2c_read_rsp->buffer, size);
>> + }
>> + if (ret != size) {
>> + printf("ratp i2c read ignored: not all bytes read (%u < %u)\n", ret, size);
>> + ret = -EIO;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + i2c_read_rsp->data_size = 0;
>> + i2c_read_rsp->errno = cpu_to_be32(ret);
>> + i2c_read_rsp_len = sizeof(*i2c_read_rsp);
>> + } else {
>> + i2c_read_rsp->data_size = cpu_to_be16(size);
>> + i2c_read_rsp->errno = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>
> It looks like you can move:
>
> i2c_read_rsp->data_size = cpu_to_be16(size);
> i2c_read_rsp->errno = cpu_to_be32(ret);
>
> outside of if since it should work as intended for both cases (size is
> 0 if ret != 0).
>
Don't think I can do that. In the if (size > 0) {} just a bit above,
size is not modified but ret may become an error. We do want to make
sure 0 is returned as size when there is an error, so cannot move it
outside the if() as you suggest here.
--
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-21 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 19:38 ` Andrey Smirnov
@ 2018-08-22 7:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-08-23 20:54 ` Aleksander Morgado
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2018-08-22 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksander Morgado; +Cc: barebox
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:19:58PM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Introduce two new RATP commands that allow running i2c read/write
> operations, very similar in format to the already existing md/mw
> RATP commands.
>
> The messages are defined with a fixed 16-bit long register field, but
> it will only be treated as a 16-bit address if I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS
> is set in the message flags field. If this flag is unset, the start
> register address is assumed 8-bit long.
>
> If the message includes the I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE flag, the start
> register field is ignored and a i2c master send/receive operation is
> performed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
> ---
> common/ratp/Makefile | 1 +
> common/ratp/i2c.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/ratp_bb.h | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 286 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 common/ratp/i2c.c
>
> diff --git a/common/ratp/Makefile b/common/ratp/Makefile
> index 2c6d674f6..0234b55c1 100644
> --- a/common/ratp/Makefile
> +++ b/common/ratp/Makefile
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-y += getenv.o
> obj-y += md.o
> obj-y += mw.o
> obj-y += reset.o
> +obj-y += i2c.o
> diff --git a/common/ratp/i2c.c b/common/ratp/i2c.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..b8d055b67
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/common/ratp/i2c.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2011-2018 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix
> + *
> + * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
> + * project.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <ratp_bb.h>
> +#include <init.h>
> +#include <driver.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <i2c/i2c.h>
> +
> +/* NOTE:
> + * - Fixed-size fields (e.g. integers) are given just after the header.
> + * - Variable-length fields are stored inside the buffer[] and their position
> + * within the buffer[] and their size are given as fixed-sized fields after
> + * the header.
> + * The message may be extended at any time keeping backwards compatibility,
> + * as the position of the buffer[] is given by the buffer_offset field. i.e.
> + * increasing the buffer_offset field we can extend the fixed-sized section
> + * to add more fields.
> + */
> +
> +#define I2C_FLAG_WIDE_ADDRESS (1 << 0)
> +#define I2C_FLAG_MASTER_MODE (1 << 1)
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> + uint8_t bus;
> + uint8_t addr;
I wonder how we see the RATP support. If it's for adhoc debugging then
bus/addr is fine. The caller should have no expectations that the bus
number is constant though. Likewise for the address which might change
across different board revisions.
Should we have support for resolving names, which could be provided by
aliases in dt?
We could still add name resolving support later as a separate call, I
just thought that now is the time to think how we proceed.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-22 7:46 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2018-08-23 20:54 ` Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-27 9:09 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Aleksander Morgado @ 2018-08-23 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
>> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request {
>> + struct ratp_bb header;
>> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
>> + uint8_t bus;
>> + uint8_t addr;
>
> I wonder how we see the RATP support. If it's for adhoc debugging then
> bus/addr is fine. The caller should have no expectations that the bus
> number is constant though. Likewise for the address which might change
> across different board revisions.
>
> Should we have support for resolving names, which could be provided by
> aliases in dt?
>
> We could still add name resolving support later as a separate call, I
> just thought that now is the time to think how we proceed.
>
I truly have no opinion here, but if name resolving is added at some
point I can either update this operation or even add a new one.
--
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-23 20:54 ` Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-27 9:09 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2018-08-27 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksander Morgado; +Cc: barebox
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:54:58PM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> >> +struct ratp_bb_i2c_read_request {
> >> + struct ratp_bb header;
> >> + uint16_t buffer_offset;
> >> + uint8_t bus;
> >> + uint8_t addr;
> >
> > I wonder how we see the RATP support. If it's for adhoc debugging then
> > bus/addr is fine. The caller should have no expectations that the bus
> > number is constant though. Likewise for the address which might change
> > across different board revisions.
> >
> > Should we have support for resolving names, which could be provided by
> > aliases in dt?
> >
> > We could still add name resolving support later as a separate call, I
> > just thought that now is the time to think how we proceed.
> >
>
> I truly have no opinion here, but if name resolving is added at some
> point I can either update this operation or even add a new one.
Ok, as said, we can add the name resolving functionality later. So, as
long as you don't see such numbering issues with the things you want to
do with RATP then I am fine with adding this when it's needed.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] bbremote: implement i2c read/write support
2018-08-21 15:19 RATP i2c and GPIO support Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-21 15:19 ` Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] bbremote: implement support for GPIO operations Aleksander Morgado
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Aleksander Morgado @ 2018-08-21 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox, s.hauer; +Cc: Aleksander Morgado
Extend the bbremote script with operations to perform binary i2c
read/write operations.
E.g.:
barebox:/ i2c_read -b 0 -a 0x68 -r 0x06A0 -c 4 -w
0x8f 0x30 0x00 0x00
barebox:/ i2c_write -b 0 -a 0x68 -r 0x06A0 -w 0x87 0x30 0x00 0x00
barebox:/ i2c_read -b 0 -a 0x68 -r 0x06A0 -c 4 -w
0x87 0x30 0x00 0x00
barebox:/ i2c_write -b 0 -a 0x68 -r 0x06A0 -w 0x8f 0x30 0x00 0x00
barebox:/ i2c_read -b 0 -a 0x68 -r 0x06A0 -c 4 -w
0x8f 0x30 0x00 0x00
===================================================================
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 i2c-read 0x00 0x68 0x06A0 0x01 4
8f300000
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 i2c-write 0x00 0x68 0x06A0 0x01 "87300000"
4 bytes written
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 i2c-read 0x00 0x68 0x06A0 0x01 4
87300000
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 i2c-write 0x00 0x68 0x06A0 0x01 "8f300000"
4 bytes written
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 i2c-read 0x00 0x68 0x06A0 0x01 4
8f300000
Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
---
scripts/remote/controller.py | 24 ++++++++++
scripts/remote/main.py | 37 ++++++++++++++++
scripts/remote/messages.py | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 147 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/remote/controller.py b/scripts/remote/controller.py
index 2ed834613..e94ad88c0 100644
--- a/scripts/remote/controller.py
+++ b/scripts/remote/controller.py
@@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ def unpack(data):
elif p_type == BBType.reset:
logging.debug("received: reset")
return BBPacketReset(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.i2c_read:
+ logging.debug("received: i2c_read")
+ return BBPacketI2cRead(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.i2c_read_return:
+ logging.debug("received: i2c_read_return")
+ return BBPacketI2cReadReturn(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.i2c_write:
+ logging.debug("received: i2c_write")
+ return BBPacketI2cWrite(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.i2c_write_return:
+ logging.debug("received: i2c_write_return")
+ return BBPacketI2cWriteReturn(raw=data)
else:
logging.debug("received: UNKNOWN")
return BBPacket(raw=data)
@@ -136,6 +148,18 @@ class Controller(Thread):
logging.info("Mw return: %r", r)
return (r.exit_code,r.written)
+ def i2c_read(self, bus, addr, reg, flags, size):
+ self._send(BBPacketI2cRead(bus=bus, addr=addr, reg=reg, flags=flags, size=size))
+ r = self._expect(BBPacketI2cReadReturn)
+ logging.info("i2c read return: %r", r)
+ return (r.exit_code,r.data)
+
+ def i2c_write(self, bus, addr, reg, flags, data):
+ self._send(BBPacketI2cWrite(bus=bus, addr=addr, reg=reg, flags=flags, data=data))
+ r = self._expect(BBPacketI2cWriteReturn)
+ logging.info("i2c write return: %r", r)
+ return (r.exit_code,r.written)
+
def reset(self, force):
self._send(BBPacketReset(force=force))
diff --git a/scripts/remote/main.py b/scripts/remote/main.py
index 38d280bfe..0f7783927 100644
--- a/scripts/remote/main.py
+++ b/scripts/remote/main.py
@@ -98,6 +98,27 @@ def handle_mw(args):
return res
+def handle_i2c_read(args):
+ ctrl = get_controller(args)
+ (res,data) = ctrl.i2c_read(args.bus, args.address, args.reg, args.flags, args.size)
+ if res == 0:
+ print(binascii.hexlify(data))
+ ctrl.close()
+ return res
+
+
+def handle_i2c_write(args):
+ ctrl = get_controller(args)
+ data=args.data
+ if ((len(data) % 2) != 0):
+ data="0"+data
+ (res,written) = ctrl.i2c_write(args.bus, args.address, args.reg, args.flags, binascii.unhexlify(data))
+ if res == 0:
+ print("%i bytes written" % written)
+ ctrl.close()
+ return res
+
+
def handle_reset(args):
ctrl = get_controller(args)
ctrl.reset(args.force)
@@ -188,6 +209,22 @@ parser_mw.add_argument('address', type=auto_int, help="address")
parser_mw.add_argument('data', help="data")
parser_mw.set_defaults(func=handle_mw)
+parser_i2c_read = subparsers.add_parser('i2c-read', help="run i2c read command")
+parser_i2c_read.add_argument('bus', type=auto_int, help="bus")
+parser_i2c_read.add_argument('address', type=auto_int, help="address")
+parser_i2c_read.add_argument('reg', type=auto_int, help="reg")
+parser_i2c_read.add_argument('flags', type=auto_int, help="flags")
+parser_i2c_read.add_argument('size', type=auto_int, help="size")
+parser_i2c_read.set_defaults(func=handle_i2c_read)
+
+parser_i2c_write = subparsers.add_parser('i2c-write', help="run i2c write command")
+parser_i2c_write.add_argument('bus', type=auto_int, help="bus")
+parser_i2c_write.add_argument('address', type=auto_int, help="address")
+parser_i2c_write.add_argument('reg', type=auto_int, help="reg")
+parser_i2c_write.add_argument('flags', type=auto_int, help="flags")
+parser_i2c_write.add_argument('data', help="data")
+parser_i2c_write.set_defaults(func=handle_i2c_write)
+
parser_reset = subparsers.add_parser('reset', help="run reset command")
parser_reset_force = parser_reset.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False)
parser_reset_force.add_argument('--force', dest='force', action='store_true')
diff --git a/scripts/remote/messages.py b/scripts/remote/messages.py
index 729f2e617..bc40cbcc3 100644
--- a/scripts/remote/messages.py
+++ b/scripts/remote/messages.py
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ class BBType(object):
mw = 12
mw_return = 13
reset = 14
+ i2c_read = 15
+ i2c_read_return = 16
+ i2c_write = 17
+ i2c_write_return = 18
class BBPacket(object):
@@ -257,3 +261,85 @@ class BBPacketReset(BBPacket):
def _pack_payload(self):
return struct.pack("?", self.force)
+
+
+class BBPacketI2cRead(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, bus=None, addr=None, reg=None, flags=None, size=None):
+ self.bus = bus
+ self.addr = addr
+ self.reg = reg
+ self.flags = flags
+ self.size = size
+ super(BBPacketI2cRead, self).__init__(BBType.i2c_read, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketI2cRead(bus=0x%x,addr=0x%x,reg=0x%x,flags=0x%x,size=%u)" % (self.bus, self.addr, self.reg, self.flags, self.size)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ buffer_offset, self.bus, self.addr, self.reg, self.flags, self.size = struct.unpack("!HBBHBH", payload[:9])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ # header size is always 4 bytes (HH) and we have 9 bytes of fixed data (HBBHBH), so buffer offset is 13
+ return struct.pack("!HBBHBH", 13, self.bus, self.addr, self.reg, self.flags, self.size)
+
+
+class BBPacketI2cReadReturn(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, exit_code=None, data=None):
+ self.exit_code = exit_code
+ self.data = data
+ super(BBPacketI2cReadReturn, self).__init__(BBType.i2c_read_return, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketI2cReadReturn(exit_code=%i, data=%s)" % (self.exit_code, binascii.hexlify(self.data))
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ buffer_offset, self.exit_code, data_size, data_offset = struct.unpack("!HLHH", payload[:10])
+ # header size is always 4 bytes (HH), so adjust the absolute data offset without the header size
+ absolute_data_offset = buffer_offset + data_offset - 4
+ self.data = payload[absolute_data_offset:absolute_data_offset + data_size]
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ # header size is always 4 bytes (HH) and we have 10 bytes of fixed data (HLHH), so buffer offset is 14
+ return struct.pack("!HLHH%ds" % len(self.data), 14, self.exit_code, len(self.data), 0, self.data)
+ return self.text
+
+
+class BBPacketI2cWrite(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, bus=None, addr=None, reg=None, flags=None, data=None):
+ self.bus = bus
+ self.addr = addr
+ self.reg = reg
+ self.flags = flags
+ self.data = data
+ super(BBPacketI2cWrite, self).__init__(BBType.i2c_write, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketI2cWrite(bus=0x%x,addr=0x%x,reg=0x%x,flags=0x%x,data=%r)" % (self.bus, self.addr, self.reg, self.flags, self.data)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ buffer_offset, self.bus, self.addr, self.reg, self.flags, data_size, data_offset = struct.unpack("!HBBHBHH", payload[:11])
+ # header size is always 4 bytes (HH), so adjust the absolute data offset without the header size
+ absolute_data_offset = buffer_offset + data_offset - 4
+ self.data = payload[absolute_data_offset:absolute_data_offset+data_size]
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ # header size is always 4 bytes (HH) and we have 11 bytes of fixed data (HBBHBHH), so buffer offset is 15
+ data_size = len(self.data)
+ return struct.pack("!HBBHBHH%ds" % data_size, 15, self.bus, self.addr, self.reg, self.flags, data_size, 0, self.data)
+
+
+class BBPacketI2cWriteReturn(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, exit_code=None, written=None):
+ self.exit_code = exit_code
+ self.written = written
+ super(BBPacketI2cWriteReturn, self).__init__(BBType.i2c_write_return, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketI2cWriteReturn(exit_code=%i, written=%i)" % (self.exit_code, self.written)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ buffer_offset, self.exit_code, self.written = struct.unpack("!HLH", payload[:8])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ # header size is always 4 bytes (HH) and we have 8 bytes of fixed data (HLH), so buffer offset is 14
+ return struct.pack("!HLH", 12, self.exit_code, self.written)
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands
2018-08-21 15:19 RATP i2c and GPIO support Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] ratp: implement i2c read/write support Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] bbremote: " Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-21 15:20 ` Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 20:18 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-22 7:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] bbremote: implement support for GPIO operations Aleksander Morgado
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Aleksander Morgado @ 2018-08-21 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox, s.hauer; +Cc: Aleksander Morgado
Introduce three new RATP commands that allow getting and setting GPIO
values as well as configuring the direction of the GPIO pins.
Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
---
common/ratp/Makefile | 1 +
common/ratp/gpio.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/ratp_bb.h | 6 ++
3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 common/ratp/gpio.c
diff --git a/common/ratp/Makefile b/common/ratp/Makefile
index 0234b55c1..3b5e495ab 100644
--- a/common/ratp/Makefile
+++ b/common/ratp/Makefile
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ obj-y += md.o
obj-y += mw.o
obj-y += reset.o
obj-y += i2c.o
+obj-y += gpio.o
diff --git a/common/ratp/gpio.c b/common/ratp/gpio.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d247cd614
--- /dev/null
+++ b/common/ratp/gpio.c
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2018 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix
+ *
+ * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
+ * project.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <ratp_bb.h>
+#include <malloc.h>
+#include <environment.h>
+#include <gpio.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+
+struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint32_t gpio;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_response {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint8_t value;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+static int ratp_cmd_gpio_get_value(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
+ struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
+{
+ struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request *gpio_req = (struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request *)req;
+ struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_response *gpio_rsp;
+ int gpio_rsp_len;
+ uint32_t gpio;
+ uint8_t value;
+
+ if (req_len < sizeof (*gpio_req)) {
+ printf ("ratp gpio get value request ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n", req_len, sizeof (*gpio_req));
+ return 2;
+ }
+
+ gpio = be32_to_cpu (gpio_req->gpio);
+ value = !!gpio_get_value(gpio);
+
+ gpio_rsp_len = sizeof(struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_response);
+ gpio_rsp = xzalloc(gpio_rsp_len);
+ gpio_rsp->header.type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE_RETURN);
+ gpio_rsp->value = value;
+
+ *rsp_len = gpio_rsp_len;
+ *rsp = (struct ratp_bb *)gpio_rsp;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(GPIO_GET_VALUE)
+ .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE,
+ .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE_RETURN,
+ .cmd = ratp_cmd_gpio_get_value
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
+
+
+struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_value_request {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint32_t gpio;
+ uint8_t value;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+static int ratp_cmd_gpio_set_value(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
+ struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
+{
+ struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_value_request *gpio_req = (struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_value_request *)req;
+ uint32_t gpio;
+
+ if (req_len < sizeof (*gpio_req)) {
+ printf ("ratp gpio set value request ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n", req_len, sizeof (*gpio_req));
+ return 2;
+ }
+
+ gpio = be32_to_cpu (gpio_req->gpio);
+ gpio_set_value(gpio, gpio_req->value);
+
+ *rsp_len = sizeof(struct ratp_bb);
+ *rsp = xzalloc(*rsp_len);
+ (*rsp)->type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_VALUE_RETURN);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(GPIO_SET_VALUE)
+ .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_VALUE,
+ .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_VALUE_RETURN,
+ .cmd = ratp_cmd_gpio_set_value
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
+
+
+struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_direction_request {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint32_t gpio;
+ uint8_t direction; /* 0: input, 1: output */
+ uint8_t value; /* applicable only if direction output */
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_direction_response {
+ struct ratp_bb header;
+ uint32_t errno;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+static int ratp_cmd_gpio_set_direction(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
+ struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
+{
+ struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_direction_request *gpio_req = (struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_direction_request *)req;
+ struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_direction_response *gpio_rsp;
+ int gpio_rsp_len;
+ uint32_t gpio;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (req_len < sizeof (*gpio_req)) {
+ printf ("ratp gpio set direction request ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n", req_len, sizeof (*gpio_req));
+ return 2;
+ }
+
+ gpio = be32_to_cpu (gpio_req->gpio);
+ if (gpio_req->direction)
+ ret = gpio_direction_output(gpio, gpio_req->value);
+ else
+ ret = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
+
+ gpio_rsp_len = sizeof(struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_direction_response);
+ gpio_rsp = xzalloc(gpio_rsp_len);
+ gpio_rsp->header.type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_DIRECTION_RETURN);
+ gpio_rsp->errno = (ret == 0 ? 0 : EIO);
+
+ *rsp_len = gpio_rsp_len;
+ *rsp = (struct ratp_bb *)gpio_rsp;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(GPIO_SET_DIRECTION)
+ .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_DIRECTION,
+ .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_DIRECTION_RETURN,
+ .cmd = ratp_cmd_gpio_set_direction
+BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
diff --git a/include/ratp_bb.h b/include/ratp_bb.h
index 32b8040b6..b6699979b 100644
--- a/include/ratp_bb.h
+++ b/include/ratp_bb.h
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@
#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_READ_RETURN 16
#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE 17
#define BB_RATP_TYPE_I2C_WRITE_RETURN 18
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE 19
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE_RETURN 20
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_VALUE 21
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_VALUE_RETURN 22
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_DIRECTION 23
+#define BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_SET_DIRECTION_RETURN 24
struct ratp_bb {
uint16_t type;
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands
2018-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-21 20:18 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-08-22 7:52 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Smirnov @ 2018-08-21 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksander Morgado; +Cc: Barebox List
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 8:20 AM Aleksander Morgado
<aleksander@aleksander.es> wrote:
>
> Introduce three new RATP commands that allow getting and setting GPIO
> values as well as configuring the direction of the GPIO pins.
>
I avoided repeating nits I already mentioned in i2c patch, some
additional nits are below
> Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
> ---
> common/ratp/Makefile | 1 +
> common/ratp/gpio.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/ratp_bb.h | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 common/ratp/gpio.c
>
> diff --git a/common/ratp/Makefile b/common/ratp/Makefile
> index 0234b55c1..3b5e495ab 100644
> --- a/common/ratp/Makefile
> +++ b/common/ratp/Makefile
> @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ obj-y += md.o
> obj-y += mw.o
> obj-y += reset.o
> obj-y += i2c.o
> +obj-y += gpio.o
> diff --git a/common/ratp/gpio.c b/common/ratp/gpio.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..d247cd614
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/common/ratp/gpio.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix
> + *
> + * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this
> + * project.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <ratp_bb.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
> +#include <environment.h>
> +#include <gpio.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint32_t gpio;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_response {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint8_t value;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +static int ratp_cmd_gpio_get_value(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
> + struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
> +{
> + struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request *gpio_req = (struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request *)req;
> + struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_response *gpio_rsp;
> + int gpio_rsp_len;
> + uint32_t gpio;
> + uint8_t value;
> +
> + if (req_len < sizeof (*gpio_req)) {
> + printf ("ratp gpio get value request ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n", req_len, sizeof (*gpio_req));
> + return 2;
Hmm, i2c code was using negative error numbers as returns, but this
just returns 2. Is this correct? If so, the it might be worth putting
a comment explaining it here, maybe?
> + }
> +
> + gpio = be32_to_cpu (gpio_req->gpio);
> + value = !!gpio_get_value(gpio);
Is this value variable really needed? It doesn't seem to be use
anywhere else but in the assignment below.
> +
> + gpio_rsp_len = sizeof(struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_response);
> + gpio_rsp = xzalloc(gpio_rsp_len);
> + gpio_rsp->header.type = cpu_to_be16(BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE_RETURN);
> + gpio_rsp->value = value;
> +
> + *rsp_len = gpio_rsp_len;
> + *rsp = (struct ratp_bb *)gpio_rsp;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_START(GPIO_GET_VALUE)
> + .request_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE,
> + .response_id = BB_RATP_TYPE_GPIO_GET_VALUE_RETURN,
> + .cmd = ratp_cmd_gpio_get_value
> +BAREBOX_RATP_CMD_END
> +
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_value_request {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint32_t gpio;
> + uint8_t value;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +static int ratp_cmd_gpio_set_value(const struct ratp_bb *req, int req_len,
> + struct ratp_bb **rsp, int *rsp_len)
> +{
> + struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_value_request *gpio_req = (struct ratp_bb_gpio_set_value_request *)req;
> + uint32_t gpio;
> +
> + if (req_len < sizeof (*gpio_req)) {
> + printf ("ratp gpio set value request ignored: size mismatch (%d < %zu)\n", req_len, sizeof (*gpio_req));
> + return 2;
> + }
> +
> + gpio = be32_to_cpu (gpio_req->gpio);
> + gpio_set_value(gpio, gpio_req->value);
> +
Not saying that you should do anything about it, but FYI this will end
up a no-op if specified GPIO is cannot be requested.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands
2018-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands Aleksander Morgado
2018-08-21 20:18 ` Andrey Smirnov
@ 2018-08-22 7:52 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2018-08-22 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksander Morgado; +Cc: barebox
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:20:00PM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Introduce three new RATP commands that allow getting and setting GPIO
> values as well as configuring the direction of the GPIO pins.
>
Same here as with the i2c bus/address thing. Being to able to use names for
the GPIOs would be a good thing.
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <ratp_bb.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
> +#include <environment.h>
> +#include <gpio.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +struct ratp_bb_gpio_get_value_request {
> + struct ratp_bb header;
> + uint32_t gpio;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
Nitpick: I prefer not to align the variable names in struct definitions.
If the next element with a longer type is added then you can only give
up the alignment or patch unrelated lines (which is bad because 'git
blame' gives no useful output for the changed lines)
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] bbremote: implement support for GPIO operations
2018-08-21 15:19 RATP i2c and GPIO support Aleksander Morgado
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] ratp: implement support for GPIO commands Aleksander Morgado
@ 2018-08-21 15:20 ` Aleksander Morgado
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Aleksander Morgado @ 2018-08-21 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox, s.hauer; +Cc: Aleksander Morgado
Extend the bbremote script with operations to manage GPIOs.
E.g.:
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ gpio_direction_input 205
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ gpio_get_value 205
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ echo $?
1
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ gpio_direction_input 206
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ gpio_get_value 206
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ echo $?
0
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ gpio_direction_output 204 0
barebox@ZII RDU2+ Board:/ gpio_set_value 204 1
===================================================================
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 gpio-set-direction 205 0 0
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 gpio-get-value 205
1
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 gpio-set-direction 206 0 0
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 gpio-get-value 206
0
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 gpio-set-direction 200 1 0
$ ./scripts/bbremote --port /dev/ttyUSB2 gpio-set-value 200 1
Signed-off-by: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
---
scripts/remote/controller.py | 36 ++++++++++++++
scripts/remote/main.py | 37 ++++++++++++++
scripts/remote/messages.py | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/remote/controller.py b/scripts/remote/controller.py
index e94ad88c0..f64eede98 100644
--- a/scripts/remote/controller.py
+++ b/scripts/remote/controller.py
@@ -70,6 +70,24 @@ def unpack(data):
elif p_type == BBType.i2c_write_return:
logging.debug("received: i2c_write_return")
return BBPacketI2cWriteReturn(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.gpio_get_value:
+ logging.debug("received: gpio_get_value")
+ return BBPacketGpioGetValue(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.gpio_get_value_return:
+ logging.debug("received: gpio_get_value_return")
+ return BBPacketGpioGetValueReturn(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.gpio_set_value:
+ logging.debug("received: gpio_set_value")
+ return BBPacketGpioSetValue(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.gpio_set_value_return:
+ logging.debug("received: gpio_set_value_return")
+ return BBPacketGpioSetValueReturn(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.gpio_set_direction:
+ logging.debug("received: gpio_set_direction")
+ return BBPacketGpioSetDirection(raw=data)
+ elif p_type == BBType.gpio_set_direction_return:
+ logging.debug("received: gpio_set_direction_return")
+ return BBPacketGpioSetDirectionReturn(raw=data)
else:
logging.debug("received: UNKNOWN")
return BBPacket(raw=data)
@@ -160,6 +178,24 @@ class Controller(Thread):
logging.info("i2c write return: %r", r)
return (r.exit_code,r.written)
+ def gpio_get_value(self, gpio):
+ self._send(BBPacketGpioGetValue(gpio=gpio))
+ r = self._expect(BBPacketGpioGetValueReturn)
+ logging.info("gpio get value return: %r", r)
+ return r.value
+
+ def gpio_set_value(self, gpio, value):
+ self._send(BBPacketGpioSetValue(gpio=gpio, value=value))
+ r = self._expect(BBPacketGpioSetValueReturn)
+ logging.info("gpio set value return: %r", r)
+ return 0
+
+ def gpio_set_direction(self, gpio, direction, value):
+ self._send(BBPacketGpioSetDirection(gpio=gpio, direction=direction, value=value))
+ r = self._expect(BBPacketGpioSetDirectionReturn)
+ logging.info("gpio set direction return: %r", r)
+ return r.exit_code
+
def reset(self, force):
self._send(BBPacketReset(force=force))
diff --git a/scripts/remote/main.py b/scripts/remote/main.py
index 0f7783927..cef5d92ee 100644
--- a/scripts/remote/main.py
+++ b/scripts/remote/main.py
@@ -119,6 +119,28 @@ def handle_i2c_write(args):
return res
+def handle_gpio_get_value(args):
+ ctrl = get_controller(args)
+ value = ctrl.gpio_get_value(args.gpio)
+ print ("%u" % value);
+ ctrl.close()
+ return 0
+
+
+def handle_gpio_set_value(args):
+ ctrl = get_controller(args)
+ ctrl.gpio_set_value(args.gpio, args.value)
+ ctrl.close()
+ return 0
+
+
+def handle_gpio_set_direction(args):
+ ctrl = get_controller(args)
+ res = ctrl.gpio_set_direction(args.gpio, args.direction, args.value)
+ ctrl.close()
+ return res
+
+
def handle_reset(args):
ctrl = get_controller(args)
ctrl.reset(args.force)
@@ -225,6 +247,21 @@ parser_i2c_write.add_argument('flags', type=auto_int, help="flags")
parser_i2c_write.add_argument('data', help="data")
parser_i2c_write.set_defaults(func=handle_i2c_write)
+parser_gpio_get_value = subparsers.add_parser('gpio-get-value', help="run gpio get value command")
+parser_gpio_get_value.add_argument('gpio', type=auto_int, help="gpio")
+parser_gpio_get_value.set_defaults(func=handle_gpio_get_value)
+
+parser_gpio_set_value = subparsers.add_parser('gpio-set-value', help="run gpio set value command")
+parser_gpio_set_value.add_argument('gpio', type=auto_int, help="gpio")
+parser_gpio_set_value.add_argument('value', type=auto_int, help="value")
+parser_gpio_set_value.set_defaults(func=handle_gpio_set_value)
+
+parser_gpio_set_direction = subparsers.add_parser('gpio-set-direction', help="run gpio set direction command")
+parser_gpio_set_direction.add_argument('gpio', type=auto_int, help="gpio")
+parser_gpio_set_direction.add_argument('direction', type=auto_int, help="direction (0: input, 1: output)")
+parser_gpio_set_direction.add_argument('value', type=auto_int, help="value (if output)")
+parser_gpio_set_direction.set_defaults(func=handle_gpio_set_direction)
+
parser_reset = subparsers.add_parser('reset', help="run reset command")
parser_reset_force = parser_reset.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False)
parser_reset_force.add_argument('--force', dest='force', action='store_true')
diff --git a/scripts/remote/messages.py b/scripts/remote/messages.py
index bc40cbcc3..abd331c8b 100644
--- a/scripts/remote/messages.py
+++ b/scripts/remote/messages.py
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ class BBType(object):
i2c_read_return = 16
i2c_write = 17
i2c_write_return = 18
+ gpio_get_value = 19
+ gpio_get_value_return = 20
+ gpio_set_value = 21
+ gpio_set_value_return = 22
+ gpio_set_direction = 23
+ gpio_set_direction_return = 24
class BBPacket(object):
@@ -343,3 +349,90 @@ class BBPacketI2cWriteReturn(BBPacket):
def _pack_payload(self):
# header size is always 4 bytes (HH) and we have 8 bytes of fixed data (HLH), so buffer offset is 14
return struct.pack("!HLH", 12, self.exit_code, self.written)
+
+
+class BBPacketGpioGetValue(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, gpio=None):
+ self.gpio = gpio
+ super(BBPacketGpioGetValue, self).__init__(BBType.gpio_get_value, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketGpioGetValue(gpio=%u)" % (self.gpio)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ self.gpio = struct.unpack("!L", payload[:4])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ return struct.pack("!L", self.gpio)
+
+
+class BBPacketGpioGetValueReturn(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, value=None):
+ self.value = value
+ super(BBPacketGpioGetValueReturn, self).__init__(BBType.gpio_get_value_return, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketGpioGetValueReturn(value=%u)" % (self.value)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ self.value = struct.unpack("!B", payload[:1])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ return struct.pack("!B", self.value)
+
+
+class BBPacketGpioSetValue(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, gpio=None, value=None):
+ self.gpio = gpio
+ self.value = value
+ super(BBPacketGpioSetValue, self).__init__(BBType.gpio_set_value, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketGpioSetValue(gpio=%u,value=%u)" % (self.gpio, self.value)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ self.gpio = struct.unpack("!LB", payload[:5])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ return struct.pack("!LB", self.gpio, self.value)
+
+
+class BBPacketGpioSetValueReturn(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, value=None):
+ self.value = value
+ super(BBPacketGpioSetValueReturn, self).__init__(BBType.gpio_set_value_return, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketGpioSetValueReturn()"
+
+
+class BBPacketGpioSetDirection(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, gpio=None, direction=None, value=None):
+ self.gpio = gpio
+ self.direction = direction
+ self.value = value
+ super(BBPacketGpioSetDirection, self).__init__(BBType.gpio_set_direction, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketGpioSetDirection(gpio=%u,direction=%u,value=%u)" % (self.gpio, self.direction, self.value)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ self.gpio = struct.unpack("!LBB", payload[:6])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ return struct.pack("!LBB", self.gpio, self.direction, self.value)
+
+
+class BBPacketGpioSetDirectionReturn(BBPacket):
+ def __init__(self, raw=None, exit_code=None):
+ self.exit_code = exit_code
+ super(BBPacketGpioSetDirectionReturn, self).__init__(BBType.gpio_set_direction_return, raw=raw)
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "BBPacketGpioSetDirectionReturn(exit_code=%u)" % (self.exit_code)
+
+ def _unpack_payload(self, payload):
+ self.exit_code = struct.unpack("!L", payload[:4])
+
+ def _pack_payload(self):
+ return struct.pack("!L", self.exit_code)
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread