From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gMr0J-0001gr-L1 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:58:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:58:20 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20181114085819.h5gv4kjhjxzyopx6@pengutronix.de> References: <20180824123800.4927-1-m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de> <1542039628.4011.7.camel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1542039628.4011.7.camel@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: i.MX5 clock: add clock provider support To: Lucas Stach Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:20:28PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 24.08.2018, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Michael Grzeschik: > > Currently it is impossible to get clks with clk_get(&clk, "name"); > > on the mx5 platform. Change that by adding clk-imx5 as clk_provider. > > It seems this patch has been forgotten. As Sascha didn't apply the > patch reworking the while MX51 clock stuff to the kernel > implementation, I think it would be good to at least pull this patch > in. Just did that. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox