Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC support

[Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>]

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:13:57PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:20:49 +0100
> Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > This is v2 of the series to add support for the Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC
> > platform and the ZCU104 Evaluation Kit.
> > 
> > The patch "[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: aarch64: add ENTRY_PROC macro for arm64"
> > probably needs a closer look, as it adds a generic macro that is expected to
> > be used by other arm64 architectures as well.
> > 
> > Changelog:
> > 
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - move ENTRY_PROC to a more generic location
> > - add separate patch for ENTRY_PROC
> > - rebase onto piggydata patches
> > - remove empty zynqmp.c and board.c
> > - use SPDX-License-Identifiers
> 
> At the moment barebox uses SPDX identifiers in very few files.
> 
> Can we adopt Linux kernel licensing rules for barebox?
> (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst)

I really like the idea of using SPDX, but I never looked into what is
necessary to use it. Adopt this license-rules file, change the headers
in the files and be done with it?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox