From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ggtLu-0008OL-0E for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 15:31:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 16:31:36 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20190108153136.4zajgi4q4oomrsj5@pengutronix.de> References: <20181217051925.17582-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/65] PCI i.MX6/DesignWare sync up with 4.20-rc1 To: Andrey Smirnov Cc: Barebox List On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:55:56PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 9:19 PM Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > > > Everyone: > > > > As a part of working on adding support for PCI on i.MX7D/8MQ, I spent > > some time looking through Linux commit history of pci-imx6.c and > > pcie-designware*.c and porting various patches to minimize the > > differences between the two codebases. This series is the result of > > that effort. All of the patches are either fixes for missed corner > > cases or code simplifications/improvements, so no functonal changes > > are expected. > > > > Tested on ZII RDU2 i.MX6Q board with i210 Ethernet card by booting > > 4.20-rc1 via TFTP (via PCI/i210). Also tested as a part of adding on > > i.MX7D/i.MX8MQ suport on i.MX7D SabreSD and i.MX8MQ RDU3 boards. > > > > Feedback is welcome! > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > - Fixed incorrect check/bug in "PCI: designware: Keep viewport fixed > > for IO transaction if num_viewport > 2" > > > > - Added patches containing code to support iATU unroll in order to > > support i.MX8MQ > > > > Thanks, > > Andrey Smirnov > > Sascha: > > Just to make sure, this series is in you review queue and it didn't > get lost, correct? Hm, yes of course :) I applied this series without looking at it. I hope nobody else realizes he just has to send that many patches to bypass any review :/ Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox