From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghuae-0005vv-OH for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:03:06 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:03:03 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20190111110302.gioxtjns6w5tfzqu@pengutronix.de> References: <20190108102412.10553-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190108102412.10553-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som: don't use fsl, no-blockmark-swap for the NAND To: Uwe =?iso-8859-15?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Stefan Riedmueller On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > barebox doesn't honor that property which yields to inconsitencies > between Linux and barebox after for example filling an UBI with a file > system with barebox and then trying to mount that from Linux. > = > Note this is an interruptive change as it requires to rewrite the flash > to make it working with Linux again. > = > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > --- > Hello, > = > I wonder why Phytec chose to use this configuration. Was this just > copied from another board? Applied, thanks Sascha -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox