From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghv6U-0002dL-HN for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:36:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:35:54 +0100 From: Roland Hieber Message-ID: <20190111113554.2zck5xq76ztn6xrb@pengutronix.de> References: <20181210155511.1376-1-rhi@pengutronix.de> <20181213065758.i6pujqsmk7ezuw3i@pengutronix.de> <20181214101325.s7skmbskin2qvvfv@pengutronix.de> <20181217094515.yc3bs4mu74gnog77@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181217094515.yc3bs4mu74gnog77@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: i.MX: improve wording, add markup and missing articles To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Barebox Mailing List On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:45:15AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:13:25AM +0100, Roland Hieber wrote: > > Hmm. It still applies here cleanly on next. Do you want it on master > > instead? I don't mind having it in next, and if you applied this series > > on master instead, the conflicts with next will probably be the other > > way around for the next release. > > Right, I found the conflicting patch and applied ontop of it. I can only find PATCH 1/1 on next, 2 and 3 seem to be lost? Do you want me to respin them? - Roland _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox