From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] fs: Change error checking logic for fsdrv->lseek() call
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:44:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190124074450.f3wykwn42qqqcfrz@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123011338.32517-5-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:13:35PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> On 32-bit systems, cheking for IS_ERR_VALUE(pos) is not
> correct. Expanding that code we get (loff_t cast is added for clarity):
>
> (loff_t)pos >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO
>
> given that loff_t is a 64-bit signed value, any perfectly valid seek
> offset that is greater than 0xffffc000 will result in false
> positive. Change the logic to check if position returned by
> fsdrv->lseek() is what's been requested. If it is, we can assume that
> operation was succesfull. If not, that's likely means failure and
> return value is a negative error code.
>
> This should accomodate both 32-bit systems, where we /dev/mem doesn't
> present any range problems, as well as 64-bit systems where both file
> offset and size of /dev/mem couldn't really be correctly captured by
> loff_t and we have to rely on 2's complement and overflow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/fs.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs.c b/fs/fs.c
> index a304bf186..6a62fb98b 100644
> --- a/fs/fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fs.c
> @@ -405,8 +405,7 @@ loff_t lseek(int fildes, loff_t offset, int whence)
> {
> struct fs_driver_d *fsdrv;
> FILE *f;
> - loff_t pos;
> - int ret;
> + loff_t pos, ret;
>
> if (check_fd(fildes))
> return -1;
> @@ -442,13 +441,11 @@ loff_t lseek(int fildes, loff_t offset, int whence)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - pos = fsdrv->lseek(&f->fsdev->dev, f, pos);
> - if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pos)) {
> - errno = -pos;
> - return -1;
> - }
> + ret = fsdrv->lseek(&f->fsdev->dev, f, pos);
> + if (ret != pos)
> + goto out;
There's no point in returning the current position from fsdrv->lseek
when the desired position is already an input parameter. I think we
should change the prototype of fsdrv->lseek to just return an error code.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-24 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 1:13 [PATCH 0/7] 32-bit lseek and /dev/mem fixes/improvements Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 1/7] commands: Move mem_parse_options() to lib/misc.c Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] commands: Get rid of mem_rw_buf Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 3/7] commands: Move /dev/mem driver to drivers/misc Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs: Change error checking logic for fsdrv->lseek() call Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-24 7:44 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2019-01-24 19:19 ` Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs: Calculate new position before validtiy check in lseek() Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-24 7:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-24 19:37 ` Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs: Add support for files larger than MAX_LFS_FILESIZE Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-24 8:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-01-24 19:43 ` Andrey Smirnov
2019-01-23 1:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] misc: mem: Set correct size for /dev/mem Andrey Smirnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190124074450.f3wykwn42qqqcfrz@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox