From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: aarch64: Avoid relocations in runtime-offset.S
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 17:30:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130013050.3834-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> (raw)
Since get_runtime_offset() is executed as a part of reloaction logic,
it cannot have code dependend on any kind of
relocation. Unfortunately, current codebase violates this rule and
linkadr:
.quad get_runtime_offset
ends up producing R_AARCH64_RELATIVE relocation that has to be
resolved at runtime. From tiral and error experimentation it seems
that the simplest way to do this is to drop "a" (allocatable)
attribute fom the section directive in runtime-offset.S
With "a" (see first entry):
aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -R images/start_zii_imx8mq_dev.pbl
images/start_zii_imx8mq_dev.pbl: file format elf64-littleaarch64
DYNAMIC RELOCATION RECORDS
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
00000000000000b0 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00000000000000a0
0000000000004258 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x0000000000028118
0000000000004260 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x0000000000028128
00000000000042e0 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*
00000000000042e8 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x0000000000028118
00000000000042f0 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00000000000042c8
Without "a":
aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -R images/start_zii_imx8mq_dev.pbl
images/start_zii_imx8mq_dev.pbl: file format elf64-littleaarch64
DYNAMIC RELOCATION RECORDS
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
0000000000004258 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x0000000000028100
0000000000004260 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x0000000000028110
00000000000042e0 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*
00000000000042e8 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x0000000000028100
00000000000042f0 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00000000000042c8
Note that on recent toolchains (tested on 8.1.1), this problem is
masked by the fact that
.quad get_runtime_offset
will be initialized with link-time value of "get_runtime_offset" in
addition to having a R_AARCH64_RELATIVE relocation.
00000000000000a0 <get_runtime_offset>:
a0: 10000000 adr x0, a0 <get_runtime_offset>
a4: 58000061 ldr x1, b0 <linkadr>
a8: eb010000 subs x0, x0, x1
ac: d65f03c0 ret
00000000000000b0 <linkadr>:
b0: 000000a0 .word 0x000000a0
b4: 00000000 .word 0x00000000
_However_, older toolchains (tested on 5.5.0), will only issue a
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE, so memory location will contain only zeroes:
00000000000000a0 <get_runtime_offset>:
a0: 10000000 adr x0, a0 <get_runtime_offset>
a4: 58000061 ldr x1, b0 <linkadr>
a8: eb010000 subs x0, x0, x1
ac: d65f03c0 ret
00000000000000b0 <linkadr>:
...
This leads to an very early crash and complete boot failure in the
latter case.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
---
Changes since [v1]:
- Added a comment explaining the reasoning "a" specifier is
missing
[v1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2019-January/036779.html
arch/arm/lib64/runtime-offset.S | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib64/runtime-offset.S b/arch/arm/lib64/runtime-offset.S
index 177ca6478..6624fdfa1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib64/runtime-offset.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib64/runtime-offset.S
@@ -1,7 +1,19 @@
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <asm/assembler.h>
-.section ".text_bare_init","ax"
+/*
+ * The .section directive below intentionally omits "a", since that
+ * appears to be the simplest way to force assembler to not generate
+ * R_AARCH64_RELATIVE relocation for
+ *
+ * linkadr:
+ * .quad get_runtime_offset
+ *
+ * statement below. While having that relocating was relatively
+ * harmless with GCC8, builging the code with GCC5 resulted in
+ * "linkaddr" being initialized to 0 causing complete boot breakdown
+ */
+.section ".text_bare_init","x"
/*
* Get the offset between the link address and the address
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 1:30 Andrey Smirnov [this message]
2019-02-01 6:40 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190130013050.3834-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--to=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox