From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mfe@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] memory: of_fixup: adapt to new memory layout
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:20:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211162013.5320-2-m.felsch@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211162013.5320-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Since kernel 4.16 the memory nodes got a @<reg> suffix so the fixup
won't work correctly anymore, because instead of adapting the extisting
one it creates a new node.
To be compatible with the old and new layout delete the found memory
node and create a new one. The new node follows the new @<reg> style.
The patch also renames the node element to root to make it more clear.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
common/memory.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/memory.c b/common/memory.c
index 00fa7c50ff..5402acab8e 100644
--- a/common/memory.c
+++ b/common/memory.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int memory_bank_first_find_space(resource_size_t *retstart,
#ifdef CONFIG_OFTREE
-static int of_memory_fixup(struct device_node *node, void *unused)
+static int of_memory_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *unused)
{
struct memory_bank *bank;
int err;
@@ -232,7 +232,23 @@ static int of_memory_fixup(struct device_node *node, void *unused)
struct device_node *memnode;
u8 tmp[16 * 16]; /* Up to 64-bit address + 64-bit size */
- memnode = of_create_node(node, "/memory");
+ /*
+ * Since kernel 4.16 the memory node got a @<reg> suffix. To support
+ * the old and the new style delete any found memory node and add it
+ * again to be sure that the memory node exists only once. It shouldn't
+ * bother older kernels if the memory node has this suffix so adding it
+ * following the new style.
+ */
+
+ memnode = of_find_node_by_name(root, "memory");
+ if (!memnode)
+ memnode = of_find_node_by_type(root, "memory");
+
+ if (memnode)
+ of_delete_node(memnode);
+
+ /* At this moment we don't know the <reg> val */
+ memnode = of_create_node(root, "/memory");
if (!memnode)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -256,6 +272,10 @@ static int of_memory_fixup(struct device_node *node, void *unused)
return err;
}
+ /* now adapt the node name */
+ of_rename_node(memnode, basprintf("memory@%llx",
+ of_read_number((u32 *)tmp, addr_cell_len)));
+
return 0;
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 16:20 [PATCH 1/2] of: base: add helper to rename a node Marco Felsch
2019-02-11 16:20 ` Marco Felsch [this message]
2019-02-12 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] memory: of_fixup: adapt to new memory layout Sascha Hauer
2019-02-12 8:45 ` Marco Felsch
2019-02-12 8:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-02-12 9:01 ` Marco Felsch
2019-02-12 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: base: add helper to rename a node Sascha Hauer
2019-02-12 8:49 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211162013.5320-2-m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--to=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mfe@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox